tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post1370736787970726719..comments2024-03-18T07:15:27.206+00:00Comments on HARRY J: Is Nick Griffin A Freemason (Why The New World Order Needs The BNP)?Harry Jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08299538663895557942noreply@blogger.comBlogger53125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-89761212001302861392018-07-25T14:04:40.289+01:002018-07-25T14:04:40.289+01:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-29472400910206651312017-02-04T07:45:27.357+00:002017-02-04T07:45:27.357+00:00I have been using AVG Anti virus for many years no...I have been using <b><a href="http://antivirus.syntaxlinks.com/r/AVG" rel="nofollow">AVG</a></b> Anti virus for many years now, I'd recommend this anti-virus to everyone.Bloggerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07287821785570247118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-18087577792685438742014-06-12T12:42:00.961+01:002014-06-12T12:42:00.961+01:00I understand you now Revolutionary Harry. ThanksI understand you now Revolutionary Harry. ThanksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-22015808584462874592014-06-11T23:04:45.916+01:002014-06-11T23:04:45.916+01:00When studying the ‘NWO’ the parable of the blind m...When studying the ‘NWO’ the parable of the blind men and the elephant comes to mind. It can certainly appear to be ‘communist’ from some perspectives but it’s worth remembering that both left and right, capitalism and communism are controlled and manipulated in order to further the agenda. <br /><br />As for the Pike letter, read the link below and make your own mind up. Even if it is a hoax, in the sense that it isn’t what was first claimed, someone somewhere devised the ‘hoax’, which as you suggested is remarkably similar to how events are unfolding. That’s even more the case with the Protocols, regardless of who wrote them.<br /><br />http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Articles/Pike-Mazzini_Three-World-Wars.htm<br /><br />It seems to me that Marxism was a creation of the ruling class/money power and is just a means to an end. Oswald Spengler had it about right:<br /><br />“There is no proletarian, not even a Communist movement, that has not operated in the interests of money, and for the time being permitted by money - and that without the idealists among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact.”<br /><br />http://izquotes.com/quote/268558<br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />Harry.Harry Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08299538663895557942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-70320730668951814482014-06-11T14:39:35.022+01:002014-06-11T14:39:35.022+01:00The time will surely come when the mask of "d...The time will surely come when the mask of "democracy" will be lifted because this has been a socialist (Marxist-Leninist) experiment all along. Why do you think the Western powers want world democracy and socialism? Why do you think Russia became "democratised" following the "collapse" of the Soviet Union? You somehow seem to have a little difficulty accepting that communism entered into its "antithesis" stage, fooling the world that it became an outdated ideology. With all due respect, I must say that going by your vague and equivocal responses, I am not about to figure out how much of what I have said so far you understand or agree with.<br /><br />In my opinion, your blog article is an intelligently and impressive written piece of work and I have been pleased I stumbled across it by chance. This is why I feel compelled to share with you the unprecedented and peerless works of Anatoliy Golitsyn, Christopher Story and Joseph D. Douglass Jr., which are urgent but sadly unheeded messages to those who have not been deceived.<br /><br />In a speech in October 1987, Mikhail Gorbachev said, <br /><br />"In October 1917, we parted with the Old World, rejecting it once and for all. We are moving toward a new world, the world of Communism. We shall never turn off that road."<br /><br />The following speech was made by Dimitri Manuilski to the Lenin School for Political Warfare in the 1930's:<br /><br />"War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in 30 to 40 years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we will smash them with our clenched fist."<br /><br />These two examples are just the tip of the iceberg of the proofs and vindications of everything I have written so far. According to Golitsyn, "Western experts [even NWO conspiracy theorists (not quoted)] fail to perceive the strategic continuity behind events. They accumulate facts but are unable to see their strategic interaction and cannot build them into a strategic picture. They lack vision and insight, which is why they are floundering in the face of the onslaught which they fail to understand."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-30946386161964024252014-06-11T14:38:39.347+01:002014-06-11T14:38:39.347+01:00Why do you think that Albert Pike's letter is ...Why do you think that Albert Pike's letter is a hoax? Isn't what is purportedly written by this Illuminist in accordance with the plan for "humanity", as you stated, to be "traumatised and 'prepared' through various cataclysms etc"? Perhaps though you are right that it is a fake letter, for who can be fully certain whether it is or isn't? But I guess the same uncertainty could be said about the so-called "anti-semitic hoax", 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.'<br /><br />It is important to consider the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad as a possible catalyst to World War III, as enunciated by Christopher Story in his book, "The European Union Collective: Enemy of its Member States." This seems to be the part of the plan for Russian hegemony over Europe and the eastwards expansion of the EU, which will inevitably result in a single socialist power bloc from Lisbon to Vladivostok, with Moscow as the capital. The Russians have been moving stockpiles of nuclear weapons into this military zone since the "collapse" of its "former" regime. They have another strategically-placed military zone at Mosdok in the Caucasus region.<br /><br />The ruling classes will not "just roll over and become 'equal' with the rest of us." They will be levelled by the World Revolution because they, the symbol of the "bourgeoisie", are a primary target along with the Church, as they represent inequality (which the World Revolution despises), the common good, and national sovereignty. They are incompatible with the World Revolution's egalitarian principles. It is erroneous to think that the ruling class, monarchy, nobility, hierarchy, and authority per se is the enemy. This is classic Marxist-Leninist deception to instil and arouse revolutionary tendencies.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-52134832960318696982014-06-10T22:12:40.943+01:002014-06-10T22:12:40.943+01:00Certainly some form of collectivism will be part o...Certainly some form of collectivism will be part of the proposed new system but it's hard to believe that the ruling classes will just roll over and become 'equal' with the rest of us. Something along the lines of China, with a bit more 'democracy' seems more likely. Collectivism for the masses with a small ruling elite controlling things including the corporations. Remember this is to come about after humanity has been traumatised and 'prepared' through various cataclysms etc.Harry Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08299538663895557942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-71075714115432524582014-06-08T22:29:24.908+01:002014-06-08T22:29:24.908+01:00Your point about the British introducing opium to ...Your point about the British introducing opium to the Chinese in the first place is a very interesting point indeed, and you are probably right. Although, I have not read anything about this myself, I have certainly heard about it, including the 'opium wars'. I do not believe however that this would in any way contradict the theory of the Soviet-Chinese narcotics offensive against the West. The communist strategy against the West has a truly Western provenance, because the Illuminati created and financed the Marxist-Leninist ideology. <br /><br />The British Empire was essentially Hermetic and occultist throughout its existence. Hermetic tradition is what eventually gave rise to the "Age of Enlightenment" and the Order of the Illumimati. As I pointed about before, the overt and subsequent covert Soviet Union, and it's satellite states such as Cuba, created "narco-states" to act as surrogates to keep their long-range strategic offensive against the West from being discovered and to appear "clean" themselves. In the same way before that, the Illuminati powers of the Western Hemisphere created the Soviet Union and Red China, along with their communist proxy states, as their own surrogates for the very same purpose. It would not be surprising then that the British had this in mind if they did indeed introduce opium into China and South Asia.<br /><br />Going off your point that you don't think the end game is intended to be outright Communist, "because in many respects that would be too obvious", and also that "It’s perhaps more likely to be some sort of third way, Communist/Corporatist blend presented as a utopia", this is precisely the reason why the Leninist strategists use the following dialectical cycle:<br /><br />Thesis: <br />The perception of institutionalised East-West confrontation, with the threat of nuclear annihilation and indifference towards the environment. This is overt communism or the 'Stalinist' model.<br /><br />Antithesis; <br />Sudden termination of the perception of East-West confrontation (destruction of 'the image' of the enemy) with the apparent (but unspoken, provisional, reversible and thus false) renunciation of the threat of nuclear annihilation, and a sudden, unfamiliar global emphasis on the environment. This is covert communism or the long-planned, updated and regalvanised, Leninist World Revolutionary model. Co-operation blackmail, with the threat of a return to the Cold War, or worse, manipulates the West into co-operating with the "former" Soviet Union only on the latter's terms.<br /><br />Synthesis: <br />The construction of a New World Collective Social Order.<br /><br />Of course, it seems communism is only one of the many dialectical methods used to construct the New World Order. But it is the chosen model, and synthesis, for the collectivisation of the whole world because all policies are based upon socialist ideals and we are all moving along socialist rails.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-20434887724729771072014-06-08T22:26:12.473+01:002014-06-08T22:26:12.473+01:00Hi Harry,
Thanks for your response. I have certai...Hi Harry,<br /><br />Thanks for your response. I have certainly come across the skeptical comments myself online about Christopher Story. But these comments, including the ones which accuse him of being an intelligence agent, are based upon no real evidence or any substantial argument. It goes without saying that any high profile person who publicly attempts to expose the true nature or strategy of the World Revolution will inevitably suffer both character assassination (if not physical assassination) and 'damnatio memoriae'. <br /><br />I highly doubt that someone like David Icke, for example, is genuine and not an agent himself, because he has plenty of credibility, and is a prominent figure with his ongoing Web site presence and appearances at major world conferences; something unrealistic and unthinkable for those who are genuine. I believe he is a false shepherd for NWO conspiracy theorists, because he does not expose the true nature and strategy of the Revolution, and advocates revolution itself along the lines of Hegelian dialectics. All this without even mentioning his laughable theory of shape-shifting reptiles being behind the NWO conspiracy. You can always tell a tree by its fruit. <br /><br />Having read "The European Union Collective: Enemy of its Member States", I cannot honestly see how Story can be anything but genuine, because there is nothing he proposes in his well-researched thesis that serves the Revolution's agenda in any way. He was a proponent and publisher of genuine Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn's "Memoranda to the CIA", which Story compiled into a book titled "The Perestroika Deception". I have also read this book myself and it is irrefutable and accurate. <br /><br />I have my serious doubts that Story's skeptics have even read his book ('The European Union Collective: Enemy of its Member States') which, like Anatoliy Golitsyn's 'The Perestroika Deception', is a very urgent warning to the West which has gone completely ignored. I would still highly recommend that you read at least some of it yourself to see what you think. Golitsyn's book is also a highly recommended read even only for the vindication of Story, to understand that a treacherous person could never propagate such a book. Both these reads are easily available on the Internet for free in PDF format.<br /><br />I agree with you on the point that communism is not the ultimate "end game" of the NWO. But it certainly is the chosen universal model for the future, if you are awake enough to see it. This is because communism is the vehicle for the implementation of its real agenda, which is not atheistic. The ultimate end game of the NWO is universal adoration of Satan and the perdition of the whole of Mankind. Communism has an occult provenance and is in fact an unbroken continuum of the French Revolution. When communism achieves its final world victory and triumph, atheism will then be destroyed in the same manner as Christianity, Islam, Judaism and other multifarious religions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-39591109742101015902014-06-07T01:03:38.520+01:002014-06-07T01:03:38.520+01:00Thanks for your comment Anon. It prompted me to re...Thanks for your comment Anon. It prompted me to reread the article for myself. It stands up fairly well although I may have to edit the part referring to Albert Pike’s ‘letter’. I’m now of the opinion it’s a fake but it’s very existence at least tells us something. I may also add some information about UKIP who appear to have replaced the BNP as the ‘bête noire’ of the ‘left’.<br /><br />I’m not sure if you’re aware but Story is suspected of being an intelligence agent. His version of events appears to be the standard mixture of truth and deception. The ‘cold war’ itself was essentially phoney, which means that neither side could lose, as properly understood. The string pullers ‘won’, or at least progressed their agenda.<br /><br />With regards to opium being sent to the West by Mao it would be worth studying the British/Chinese opium wars to see who introduced it to the Chinese in the first place.<br /><br />There’s little doubt that much of the agenda is played out through broadly left wing channels. Gramsci and the Frankfurt School being excellent examples. I’m not at all sure the end game is intended to be outright Communist though. In many respects that would be too obvious. It’s perhaps more likely to be some sort of third way, Communist/Corporatist blend presented as a utopia. As you pointed out, they’ve played a similar trick before with the French Revolution.<br /><br />I certainly agree that this is, in essence, a spiritual war. I also agree that the ‘left’ have and still are, horribly manipulated. <br /><br />Thanks again for your comment.Harry Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08299538663895557942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-50380169942585026472014-06-06T22:21:58.428+01:002014-06-06T22:21:58.428+01:00The other great enemy of the Revolution besides th...The other great enemy of the Revolution besides the nobility, is the Church, which is why it doesn't take a genius to work out that the Church has been subverted and corrupted since the days of the second Vatican council, the same era when the long-range strategy against the West, and the "march through the institutions" were beginning to take shape under Nikita Khrushchev. The latter is one of the many dimensions, or facets, of the long-range Leninist strategic offensive against the West. <br /><br />The truth is that both nobility and the Church are enemies, not of the people (they were both established as vanguards of the common good), but of the Revolution, which rightly sees them as the greatest obstacle to the NWO. This is the reason why the many scandals of the Church have been engineered by the Leninist Revolutionaries, who have successfully infiltrated this truly legitimate institution to its very highest levels.<br /><br />With regards to my thoughts on the majority of NWO conspiracy theorists being misled, I am not referring in any way to the author of this blog because he is accurate and conclusive in everything he has written, although I have to say he is somewhat in error describing the NWO as a "fascist" regime and for well-meaningly adopting the provocative and demagogic catchword "revolution" in his blog title.<br /><br />It is worth noting that the World Revolution has made great success in subverting the value of the word "conspiracy" along with the integrity of the "conspiracy theorist". This is the result of social engineering in order to achieve thought-hegemony and agenda control (the 'common mind'), which is a powerful mind control strategy. This is evincively seen with the "political correctness" agenda which controls and monitors freedom of expression for the NWO agenda. Any dissent or way of thinking which does not follow this general line is greatly devalued and ridiculed by way of character assassination. This is greatly evident with the word "conspiracy", a word nowadays which our society associates with the asinine.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-69136054425332156332014-06-06T22:20:51.695+01:002014-06-06T22:20:51.695+01:00Hi sjacrane,
I think you may be somewhat misinfor...Hi sjacrane,<br /><br />I think you may be somewhat misinformed about the true nature of the EU. Since when has membership of this Babel project ever been reversible, and when have our leaders ever truly had the interests of their own people at heart since they have long betrayed us with their undemocratic decision to sell us down the river of irreversible EU collectivisation? Which European country, having already once joined the EU, ever got out of it? I honestly don't believe that any single policy made in Brussels has ever been reversed, except of course for the strategic purposes of its own collectivisation agenda. The EU has an iron grip on everyone and everything it possesses and only ever permits things on its own terms. <br /><br />Reversal of EU membership is sadly unrealistic. Most people do not realise this truth. Our policy makers lie to us when they say that we are drawing closer to exiting the EU. They are just contributing to the great inverted pyramid of lies which is essential for the success of the NWO and the great march towards one-world governance. It is also foolhardy to believe that the EU is on the verge of ruin, the same tactic which the overt USSR often used to appear weak and defeated.<br /><br />It is also naive to adopt the deceptive class struggle view such as "We are many and they are few", or "We are the 99% and they are the 1%", because this is playing precisely into their hands. This is just the same revolutionary propaganda that they always use to continually foster socialism and revolutionary tendencies in the hearts and minds of the population and to strengthen the far-left socialist (communist) cause. The hoi polloi are sadly easily led like sheep, brainwashed by the 'common-mind' agenda. <br /><br />Even the NWO conspiracy theorists are largely deceived into adopting the wrong perception as to its true provenance, as if it is some sort of class struggle against the conspiring nobility. Nobility and traditional elites are in truth also victims of this World Revolution because they are the "bourgeoisie" which the Revolution want to destroy as they represent inequality and sovereignty (it's important to know that total equality is the highest agenda of the Revolution because they want to level and collectivise every aspect of humanity). The French and Russian Revolutionaries destroyed the throne because they did not represent the Revolution's diabolical egalitarian principles. This is not to say of course that there are or were no traitors amongst the nobility or the traditional elite, or that they haven't been greatly deceived themselves.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-63359012008932031382014-06-05T14:17:19.834+01:002014-06-05T14:17:19.834+01:00Good argument anonymous, but I'm not sure you ...Good argument anonymous, but I'm not sure you will get a great deal of support for this spiritual "crusade", as we live in an increasingly secular society. Maybe this fact is all thanks to the illuminati, or whatever they call themselves, but the first thing we need to really think about is the EU. I am sure that growing public pressure will cause our leaders to bring us out of the Europe eventually. I believe they have no choice anymore.sjacranehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12829381357670364316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-1188491898802862592014-06-05T11:34:53.294+01:002014-06-05T11:34:53.294+01:00In my opinion, any such war against the NWO can on...In my opinion, any such war against the NWO can only be a spiritual war and not a physical one, because the NWO is truly occultist and satanic. St Paul said in his Epistle To The Ephesians:<br /><br />"Put you on the armour of God, that you may be able to stand against the deceits of the devil. For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and power, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places. Therefore take unto you the armour of God, that you may be able to resist in the evil day, and to stand in all things perfect. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of justice, And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace."<br /><br />So really, our struggle is against a spiritual, occult power, and against revolutionaries, co-conspirators and traitors who have sold their souls to the devil to exercise his dominion. Those include leaders of European nations who have chose membership of the EU, knowing full well that it meant selling their own people down the river of EU collectivisation that can never in truth be reversed. Therefore, any worldly or human resistance without God on our side is a fruitless struggle against this "secret power of lawlessness". With God on our side, we certainly can wage battle against this enemy and be victorious, just like at the Battle of Lepanto in 1571, when the Holy League, a coalition of southern European Catholic maritime states, decisively defeated the main fleet of the Ottoman Empire in a naval battle which saw the former hugely outnumbered by the powerful Muslim fleet. The European fleet simply had Our Lady as their Patron, and used the Holy Rosary as their greatest weapon.<br /><br />Perhaps the gravest error to be made by people who try to resist the NWO is that they try to adopt the revolutionary spirit, seen especially in far-left movements who see the NWO as a "fascist" regime, or see it as some sort of class struggle. Thus they fall into the same snare as the French people did in 1789, or the Russian people in 1917. This is playing into the hands of the Leninist Revolutionaries (emissaries of the Illuminati), who have manipulated the far-left movements into adopting a class struggle view that nobility and other traditional elites are the real culprits behind the NWO agenda. Revolutions have always been a top-down approach and not a bottom-up approach. But the class struggle is just another dialectical ploy. True opponents of the NWO may be better to call themselves counter-revolutionaries, as this is the more appropriate word to describe genuine crusaders who strive to counter the revolutionary tendencies and try to preserve our national sovereignties, traditions, and moral laws from being lost forever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-30364841994071840522014-06-05T11:30:48.494+01:002014-06-05T11:30:48.494+01:00Yet another facet is the cultural hegemony of &quo...Yet another facet is the cultural hegemony of "garbage" values first conceived by the founder of the Italian Communist Party, Antonio Gramsci. He envisioned the use of cultural institutions for the direct manipulation of Western minds, especially young minds, and to replace beautiful and worthy ideals with ugliness and worthlessness. This subversion of the arts and other cultural institutions seems to have the same provenance as that of the other facets of the Leninist Revolution. This is because the Leninist strategists under Khrushchev willingly took on Gramsci's idea for the purpose of their long-range strategy to subvert the West, and create a "common-mind" that would be devoid of any real appreciation for traditional values or lofty ideals.<br /><br />Indeed, in light of such excellent research, it is clear that Khrushchev was certainly no less an evil monster than his predecessor, Stalin. He and his Leninist co-conspirators denounced Stalin after his death only for strategic purposes. Such monumental crimes, and those of successive Soviet leaders and generals to this day, have remained buried in state archives, never to be the subject of international condemnation or a communist "Nuremberg". This reason being that world governance has been the true agenda of Western powers since the Age of "Enlightenment", and the final triumph of world communism will fulfil that desire. Although Stalin's image is somewhat an exception, he was, contrary to conventional wisdom, a true practicing Leninist and not an anomaly of the true cause of his predecessor. The very same atrocities were committed by V. I. Lenin and his Bolsheviks.<br /><br />In case this may cause some confusion to some who hold the theory that it is the Illuminati and the bankers (particularly the Rothschilds) who are behind the NWO, I will simply say that it is they who were the creators of the Marxist-Leninist agenda, and have governed it all along. The "atheist" ideology of Marx and Lenin is inherently occultist and satanist. I have come across at least one propagandist poster online of V. I. Lenin posing as Baphomet, as can be seen in the following link:<br /><br />http://thecharnelhouse.org/2013/06/12/leninbulb/#jp-carousel-9987<br /><br />You may also key in "Lenin propaganda poster" on Google images and find it there somewhere, if the link no longer works.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-58248679708674085372014-06-05T11:28:47.406+01:002014-06-05T11:28:47.406+01:00One of the other facets of the Leninist long-range...One of the other facets of the Leninist long-range revolutionary strategy include drugs, especially narcotics, which had always been a Soviet-Chinese joint intelligence operation from the very start. This satanic conspiracy to destabilise the West was first conceived by Mao Tse Tung in the 1930s, who used opium against his opponents to successfully establish Marxism-Leninism throughout China, and then was eventually launched by the Soviets under Khrushchev as a worldwide covert offensive against the West from the late 1950s onwards. This is described in great detail in a brilliant book written by American analyst Joseph D. Douglass Jr. titled "Red Cocaine". <br /><br />GRU (Russian Military Intelligence), are believed to be the leading covert intelligence force behind both international drug trafficking and false flag "Islamic terrorism" activities. The Soviets (and "post" Soviets) and Red China have been careful enough to use surrogate states (i.e. Columbia, Mexico, Afghanistan, etc) for their drug offensive operations against the West in order for their strategy to remain undiscovered. <br /><br />Another facet of this same global Leninist long-range revolutionary strategy is mind-control drugs, as part of their chemical war offensive. Another brilliantly researched book was written by the same Joseph D. Douglass Jr. titled, "Betrayed", which details how both the Korean and Vietnam wars were nothing more than a treacherous plan by the American government to provide the Soviets with an abundant supply of American servicemen to be used as guinea pigs in the USSR, North Korea and North Vietnam for the testing of Soviet mind-control drugs, lethal poisons and chemical and nuclear weapons. How else were they going to improve upon one of their most favoured methods of statecraft to a unimaginably sophisticated degree? There had to be human sacrifice on an enormous scale, as is always the true result of the Communist cause, and the American government has simply covered up this treacherous crime against their own people ever since.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-59628969592901883732014-06-05T11:26:50.688+01:002014-06-05T11:26:50.688+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.sjacranehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12829381357670364316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-76724042938681472872014-06-05T11:24:57.758+01:002014-06-05T11:24:57.758+01:00Hi Harry,
I have just finished reading your arti...Hi Harry, <br /><br />I have just finished reading your article, something which I can truly describe as very intellectual and accurate. It's gave me the same level of insight into the subject of the NWO as a well-written book which you perhaps may or may not have yet come across. It's a book written by Christopher Story in 2002 titled, "The European Union Collective, Enemy of its Member States". This book describes the EU as nothing other than a vehicle for the Leninist Revolutionary long-range strategy, which the Leninist strategists actually created as they planned for over 30 years from the late 1950s, under the leadership of Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, the controlled "collapse" of the Soviet Union, which as we know was completed under the leadership of Mikhail Gorbachev. <br /><br />The EU, which Gorbachev has more recently and accurately called the "Great European Soviet", exists as part of a global Leninist conspiracy to destroy the nation state, collectivise every aspect of human life, and create a one-world socialist (communist) government as a result of what the genuine Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn predicted to be the "Second October Revolution". If you haven't yet read Story's book, I would highly recommend it, so that you may further understand the true nature and provenance of the EU, NWO and how the West truly lost the "Cold War" - which itself was a dialectical ploy. Unfortunately, the West has been tricked into believing that they had won the Cold War when the fake "collapse" occurred between 1989 and 1991. <br /><br />What we have now in our days is an insidious and unperceived enemy who are furthering Lenin's diabolical conspiracy against the nation state, and are relentlessly striving for a single European political space that stretches from the Atlantic to Vladivostok on the East coast of Siberia, with Moscow being the planned capital, and not Brussels. This, of course, is the inevitable transition towards a one-world communist government. This book describes just one facet of the World Leninist Revolution launched under Khrushchev in the late 1950s. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-22207877663466251042014-03-08T19:37:31.810+00:002014-03-08T19:37:31.810+00:00In response to Harbinger:
Islam may appear good b...In response to Harbinger:<br /><br />Islam may appear good but it's persecution and murder of anyone non-muslim, violence toward women, sexual abuse of children, legal marriage to a child of 5 and so on, makes it so much worse than anything else I have ever known.<br /><br />These are the sort of things that most other religions abandoned centuries ago.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-25701606467404951322012-08-23T10:10:24.750+01:002012-08-23T10:10:24.750+01:00We are the innocents, we are being manipulated. th...We are the innocents, we are being manipulated. they are the the illuminated ones, the smart guys.<br /><br />Why don't we make power and money to defend our ground. http://tinyurl.com/d9kdogaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-45158065941428256762012-01-23T23:47:14.734+00:002012-01-23T23:47:14.734+00:00Anon, you make a very fair observation. I'm tr...Anon, you make a very fair observation. I'm trying to finish an article on this subject at the moment. Sadly the conclusion is that at least most of the high profile opposition is controlled. As you say, this is a depressing conclusion. Personally I'm grateful for at least realising this much. Tying my colours to Brian Gerrish's, David Icke's or even Nick Griffin's mast was going to get me absolutely nowhere. <br /><br />What we should realise though is that there are indeed many, many sincere people who are indeed 'opposed' to all that is happening. It's precisely because the PTB (or whatever you wish to call them) foresaw this happening that they've provided our 'leaders' for us.<br /><br />Do I have any positive points to add? Well we're not finished yet and Their 'game' is becoming apparent. A wider realisation of this may yet spark more grassroots resistance. I have a germ of an idea that I'll hopefully float sometime soon. How about you? Any ideas?Harry Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08299538663895557942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-19512785697749727552012-01-23T02:01:36.952+00:002012-01-23T02:01:36.952+00:00I've spent some time reading and enjoying your...I've spent some time reading and enjoying your illuminating articles and I've little doubt that much of the content is true in respect of 'controlled opposition'. <br /><br />But, it is over-ridingly negative and depressing in that the only conclusion that may be drawn is that essentially ALL opposition is 'controlled' - and that no sincere opposition, nor people, exist.<br /><br />Do you have any more positive points to add, or, as in the words of the Scottish guy in "Dads Army"......."We're all Doomed, - DOOOMED, I tell you!"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-82362180632371486682011-11-13T23:55:46.639+00:002011-11-13T23:55:46.639+00:00CanSpeccy, it's a tangled web that is hard to ...CanSpeccy, it's a tangled web that is hard to see through. The perspective of those who see the Queen et al as the pinnacle is a slightly different one. They would suggest that the 'bureaucrats' are merely in service of the 'financial forces' who in turn are deferential to the ruling 'bloodlines'. The argument is that it is this, largely European, 'bloodline 'elite', of the royal and aristocratic variety, that really call the shots. In this hierarchy the Saxe-Coburg-Gothas are at or near the pinnacle. Who knows, maybe they are. We should treat the establishment 'historians' who tell us how it is (or how they'd like us to think it is) with a degree of caution I think.Harry Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08299538663895557942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-55024453494617585192011-11-13T23:27:56.178+00:002011-11-13T23:27:56.178+00:00The Royal assent (according to Wikipedia):
"...The Royal assent (according to Wikipedia):<br /><br />"The granting of royal assent refers to the method by which any constitutional monarch formally approves and promulgates an act of his or her nation's parliament, thus making it a law. In the vast majority of contemporary monarchies, this act is considered to be little more than a formality; even in those nations which still permit their ruler to withhold the royal assent (such as the United Kingdom, Norway and Liechtenstein), the monarch almost never does so save in a dire political emergency (see reserve power), or upon the advice of his or her government."<br /><br />I believe this is correct. Use of the "reserve power" by the monarch would create a constitutional crisis. The reserve power might be used by a monarch who believed that there action would receive the support of the vast majority of the public, e.g., in the event the Government sought to act in a clearly illegal or unconstitutional way. But the outcome would be very uncertain and if the monarch's action failed to accomplish its intended purpose, it would almost certainly result in the overthrow of the monarchy. <br /><br />But there is no other mechanism by which the monarch can affect policy. The dispensing power, i.e., the power of the monarch to make law by proclamation ended with the reign of James II.CShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03399620869685840906noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987072511725902446.post-30059705379192457382011-11-12T13:42:32.248+00:002011-11-12T13:42:32.248+00:00"Nah, Parliament rules and has done very larg..."Nah, Parliament rules and has done very largely since the time of George I, who spent most of his English reign not in England but in Hanover.<br /><br />George III managed to piss-off the Americans, but the long reign of the simple-minded Victoria enabled Parliament, and the financial forces behind it, to gather up essentially all power."<br /><br />Over banking families and royals that go back centuries? That’s like that fake John Harris saying that policies don't have royal/banking assent.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com