Pages

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Creation Or Evolution?

On the BBC at the moment we are currently being told all about the 'Wonders of the Universe' by the youthful looking Professor Brian Cox. Although I haven't managed to watch all of the programs so far what amazed me was that, in the bits I have seen, the 'theory' of evolution was seemingly being presented as undeniable fact. Not too long ago I wouldn't have disagreed with such an assumption but that was until the explosion of alternative information on the internet introduced me to other points of view. Something which is very hard to come by and is conspicuous by its absence, on British TV. 


Anyone researching the New World Order agenda soon comes to the realisation that we have been and continue to be, brainwashed and indoctrinated to a shocking degree. I strongly suspect that the subject of the origins of the world and by extension the Universe is yet one more subject where the PTB have misled us badly.  


Attempting a detailed look at this subject is both beyond me and the capabilities of a humble blog post. As such I'll merely post some links to a variety of videos that have left me in no doubt that the 'theory' of evolution is just that, a theory. Not only that but it appears to be full of uncertainties and perhaps even impossibilities that we are never made aware of. In fact, after watching the videos I came to the conclusion that creation, or at least intelligent design, was far more likely to be the true source of our origin.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

New Age Communism: The "Zeitgeist" Agenda

In the last month or so I've had several 'discussions' with ardent members of the 'Zeitgeist Movement'. What struck was the fervour with which they defended the movement from my critical observations about it. I began to understand why some considered it to have become a cult.

 I'd seen the first two films and felt a little uneasy about them. The section in the first film 'exposing' Christianity was deeply flawed and the 'solution' proposed in Zeitgeist Addendum, namely the Venus Project, seemed more than a little suspect.

Reading an article on the Zeitgeist videos by Edward G. Griffin helped clarify my unease about the Venus Project and the excellent films Zeitgeist Debunked and Zeitgeist Refuted put the anti-Christian rhetoric in context. I did feel, however, that there was more to the Zeitgeist Movement than the above suggested. I'd come to understand that much of the so called 'Truth Movement' was a controlled 'psy-op' with one of its main aims, in simple terms, being to steer those who had woken up to the Orwellian New World Order being developed, in the direction of a 'good' world government. In addition this 'good' world government would have New Age (Theosophic) overtones. In short it would be the disguised New World Order the PTB were aiming for all along. As far back as 1959, William Guy Carr, in his manuscript 'Satan, Prince of This World', spoke of the Satanic elite's aim of getting us to destroy our own governments and then to usurp the first world government that would then be created.

I'd assembled some information and I was going to attempt a post on this but Richard Evans, writing on Henry Makow's website, has done a far better job than I could have hoped to have done. I've reproduced it in full below.

Just one observation. The author appears to place the 'Rothschild crime syndicate' at the centre of operations. Whilst they are indeed pivotal players in the 'game' I suspect the real controllers lie deeper in the shadows than the overt Rothschilds.

"The Zeitgeist solution is Communism re-packaged to rope in the 21st- century-truth seeker."

by Richard Evans (for henrymakow.com)

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Shock and Awe - The Manipulation of the Human Psyche

Below are four videos by Alan Watt entitled 'Shock and Awe - The Manipulation of the Human Psyche'. I was alerted to them by Bovvered on the UK Column forum. He took the time to type a section of the transcript that he felt was relevant to the deeds and words of celebrity New World researchers such as David Icke. Having satisfied myself that Icke is controlled to some degree, consciously or not, it certainly seems to describe what could be happening with him and others. 


Counterintelligence – let’s talk about counterintelligence and how it works. What is intelligence? Intelligence gathering is sending agents out to simply listen; they listen in market places, bars, cafés, as to what the people are discussing. Lawrence of Arabia, in his own bookSeven Pillars of Wisdom [said he] was trained as an agent; he was trained in Aramaic, Arabic languages. He was given lots of money – he and eleven other people, trained from Cambridge – and sent over to the Arabic countries to start up Arabic newspapers. Once they started putting stories in the newspapers they went round the market places, they hired lots of guys to listen to gossip, to see if the intelligence they were putting out in the papers was being discussed by the recipients, the readers. That’s basic intelligence gathering. What is counterintelligence? Counterintelligence, from a government’s perspective, is taking information and data that could be crucial – it could be bad for the ruling regime – and finding ways to counter that knowledge; counter it.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Aleister Crowley, George W. Bush, 9/11 and the New World Order

Yesterday evening I was listening to a radio interview with William Ramsey, author of the book, 'Prophet of Evil: Aleister Crowley, 9/11 and the New World Order'. He has also produced a video of the same name. The interview was about his book and film which looks at the connection, through Crowley, to the bringing down of the twin towers of the World Trade Centre on September 11th, 2001 and proposes that this was an occult ritual. Many of these connections are numerological and from what I've read of his work he certainly makes a convincing case. 


Ramsey's central thesis is that during Aleister Crowley's life ands work there were four key numbers involved. These were 11, 77, 93 and 175. These numbers are essential to the occult, magical system devised by Aleister Crowley.


11 was important because, amongst other reasons, '11 is the number of magic itself'.


'77 ... represents half of the formulation of sexual magic in both the O.T.O. and the Kabbalah.  It is also the 77 infernal names of the Devil in The Satanic Bible by Anton LaVey.


The cabalistic gematria values of the Greek words Thelema (Will), Agape (Love) and, Aiwass[6] in Crowley's magical system equate to the number 93. 


Liber 175 in Crowley's magical system is a ritual used to invoke any deity by adoration. 


The importance of the above is the observation that the four flight numbers on the day of 9/11 were 11, 77, 93 and 175. Ramsey's conclusion is that 9/11 was, apart from anything else, an occult ritual.

Possibly the primary number involved in the ritual was the number 11. The towers themselves were symbolic of the number 11, the date was, of course, the 11th and one of the planes was numbered flight 11.


Someone phoned in and asked Ramsey if there was a direct connection between Crowley and those behind the New World Order. He responded with several quotes that reflected their typically elitist thinking. Below is an example from the Book of the Law:


“The Book of the Law was given to mankind chiefly in order to provide it with an impeccable principal of practical politics… We should have no compunction in utilising the natural qualities of the bulk of mankind. We do not insist on trying to train sheep to hunt foxes or lecture on history; we look after their physical well being and enjoy their wool and mutton. In this way we shall have a contented class of slaves who will accept the conditions of existence as they really are, and enjoy life with the quiet wisdom of the cattle.”



In 'The Confessions of Aleister Crowley: an Autohagiography' he stated his belief that:


"… despite all its drawbacks, there was never a better social system than the feudal, so far as it derived from the patriarchal."


According to Ramsey, "he also stated that the government must lord over and manage hordes of ignorant masses".


Friday, February 18, 2011

Do The Elites Worship Lucifer?

I've had reason to refer to the elite worship or veneration of Lucifer several times in recent posts. I'm aware that this may seem a bit 'far out' for some if for no other reason than it did for me until I researched the subject. Here are a just a couple more reasons why I feel we need to face up to the fact that what we face is an occult Luciferian cabal intent on enslaving humanity.


Firstly, here is a section from an article on the Cutting Edge website entitled 'Symbols Prove Invisible Fraternity Of Freemasonry Is Satanic':


"The All-Seeing Eye was representative of the omniscience of Horus, the Sun God, [Magic Symbols, by Frederick Goodman, p. 103, Satanic symbols book]. As one Masonic book says, "These considerations lead us to an interesting topic, the Eye of Mind or the Eye of Horus ... and conveying the idea of the 'All seeing Eye'.  The end set before the Egyptian neophyte was illumination, that is to be 'brought to light'.  The Religion of Egypt was the Religion of the Light". [Thomas Milton Stewart, The Symbolism of the Gods of the Egyptians and the Light They Throw on Freemasonry, London, England, Baskerville Press, Ltd., 1927, p. 5]. This Masonic author has just told you that the Light to which Masons constantly refer, and toward which they are to constantly move, is the Religion of Horus!  This is damning, because in Egyptian Mythology, Horus IS Lucifer [Former Satanist, William Schnoebelen, Masonry:  Beyond The Light, p. 197]."


This is an important consideration. The 'All-Seeing Eye' of Horus is a widespread symbol used by occultists. Most famously it is on the rear of the American one dollar bill. and only recently we saw a representation of it in the floodlights of the new Olympic stadium in London. We can also see it in some Roman catholic churches but possibly the most prevalent of all though is the symbolic closing or hiding of one eye by celebrities in the media. It is doubtful that all of them are fully aware of what they are doing but the prevalence of this symbolism, particularly in magazines and the music industry, shows just how endemic this occultism is.



Tuesday, February 15, 2011

The Global Coup d'Etat

A financial coup d'etat

It's been a while since I've posted anything partly because I've been working on a rather long piece and partly due to other distractions and difficulties. Anyway I thought I'd take a look at this essay, 'The Global Coup d'Etat', by the late lamented Philip Jones. It was written in April 2009 which would have been not long before he passed away.

He starts off by describing the term the 'New World Order' as "the advent of a Totalitarian World Government" which is being pursued by "a powerful and secretive group known as the Illuminati…" I used to shy away from using the word 'Illuminati' because it seemed an almost cartoonish description too easily associated with the smear 'conspiracy theory'. I was aware that there was ample evidence that there was an agenda to create a world government and I thought that the use of the word 'Illuminati' may put some off some from looking at that evidence. I'm far more comfortable with using it now. I tend to see it as a useful term for those occultists at the higher levels of the secret society networks that are pulling the strings in the 'conspiracy'. William Guy Carr, in his manuscript, 'Satan, Prince of This World', places the Illuminati under the control of, what he describes as, the Synagogue of Satan. This in turn, he claims, is itself controlled by the High Priests of the Luciferian Creed. I'm not convinced that we will know the exact power structure of the controlling cabal until we have managed to defeat their attempt to create a world government. Until then I feel it's safe to say that there is an occult elite, operating through secret societies, particularly freemasonry and that this elite are both Satanic and Luciferian. In this respect the use of the descriptive term 'Illuminati' is as good as any.

Jones has a very good quote from the Comte de Saint Aulair in `Geneve contre la Paix` Libraire Plan, Paris 1936. He says:

“Marxism you say is the bitterest opponent of Capitalism, which is sacred to us. For the simple reason that they are opposite poles, they deliver over to us the two poles of the earth and permit us to be it's axis. Within these two opposites, we find ourselves identified in the Internationale. And these doctrines of the two poles of society, meet in their unity of purpose, the renewal of the world from above by the control of wealth, and from below by revolution”.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Prince Charles - The Sustainable Prince

Prince Charles with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon
and Yvo de Boer Executive Secretary of the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
at The United Nations Climate Change Conference
on December 15, 2009

In the 'Planned-opolis (A Nightmarish Vision Of The Future)' post I linked to an article called 'Prince Charles - The Sustainable Prince'. I've printed it here below because I thought it was worth a closer look.


The author of the piece, Joan Veon, describes her 'fascination' with British Royalty and later discovers its connections to the UN, which she describes as a World Government. As a result of her research she comes to the conclusion that 'all roads lead to England' meaning that she sees the British Royal Family as the power behind the UN.


It may well be that what she is actually seeing is that all roads lead to the City of London (the Crown) and from there one single road to the Vatican but that is merely my working hypothesis. 


Regardless of that, the author firmly implicates Prince Charles as a major player in the World Government agenda which many euphemistically call the New World Order.


The early roots of the UN is described as coming from a meeting in London where "they developed the idea of willing co-operation between free peoples in a world relieved of the menace of aggression." Here we see the typical twisting of language so often used by the elites. It would be interesting to know whether by 'peoples' they meant nations or whether this was an early, subtle, attempt to subvert the importance of nations in the elites desire to control us all through a world government. 


The world would benefit greatly if we truly did have sovereign nations (comprised of sovereign free people) co-operating freely in a world free of aggression. The reality is that it's the very elites themselves that have created and instigated 'aggression' in their various wars and conflicts. Those same elites fully intend to continue their control, through the UN whether we 'willingly co-operate' or not.