Fabian Socialists = Criminals

I have to agree with Republicae, in this article he wrote on the Nolan Chart website. Criminals seems the only word to describe the likes of Blair, Brown, Mandelson, Milliband and all the others involved in this malign organisation.


I disagree on a couple of points however. I suspect there's rather more to the New World Order agenda than just the Fabians. I'm also not at all sure if I agree with his contention that the 'elites' have overstretched themselves with their contrived banking collapse. I suspect they know exactly what they're doing. That said, this is an excellent article that serves as a great introduction to the Fabians.


"There are an unimaginable number of "conspiracy theories" regarding the New World Order, some with merit, most are simply illogical and without merit. I will not delve into the initial beginning of this "New World Order", but I begin at a pertinent point in its history that will, hopefully, explain just what they plans have been, how those plans have been implemented and how they will ultimately be defeated by their own plans.


It is vital to understand that the New World Order is inextricably tied to the Fabian Socialists which formed in England during the later part of the 1800s and their intricate plans for a global fascist-socialistic society. In fact, there is no New World Order outside of the Fabian Socialist agenda. It should be remembered that the Fabian Socialists were equally accepted in both the Nazi/Fascist and the Communist/Marxist/Leninist/Maoist/Trotskite ideologies. The Fabians have been, throughout their history, political and social chameleons who have, through stealth and deception, changed their outer skin to infiltrate every political, social and educational institution around the world, particularly in Great Britain and the United States. Speaking of chameleons, the primary symbol of the Fabians is a "wolf wrapped in a sheep's skin".


The Fabians, like all socialists, are completely dedicated to the centralization of all power, in all aspects of society and government. Their primary push as been to advance the idea that the power of government, The State, is the center of society. Fabians are not above calling themselves anti-socialist, conservatives, liberals, moderates, or any other name in order to achieve their goals of centralization. They are not above joining any group that can be used to influence official and public opinion to achieve their goals and indeed, they have succeeded over the decades to do just that. The rise of The State, its well-being and the gradual increase in its power is of primary importance to the Fabians over any and all considerations for the individual. Their goal has been to wean the individual away from self-dependence and responsibility toward a dependency on The State and a sense of responsibility toward the "common good".


Their "silent revolution" undermines a nation from within, deep within the bowels of the society in order accommodate a gradual, incremental transformation into a socialist society. One of the famous Fabians was George Bernard Shaw, the playwright, he stated clearly the techniques the Fabians used: "Our propaganda is one of permeating - we urged our members to join the Liberal and Radical Associations in their district, or, if they preferred it, the Conservative Associations - we permeated the party organizations and pulled all the strings we could lay our hands on with the utmost adroitness and energy, and we succeeded so well that in 1888 we gained the solid advantage of a Progressive majority full of ideas that would never have come into their heads had not the Fabians put them there."


In 1889, Sidney Webb, another Fabian said:
"The Fabian Society occupies a different sphere as a Socialist Society from that of the two larger bodies. It includes members of all the other organizations, with a number of active workers chiefly of the middle class, and 'literary proletariat'. . . . The Society exercises a considerable influence, more real than apparent, by the personal participation of its members in nearly all reform movements, as well as by their work at the Universities and in the fields of journalism and the teaching of Political Economy. It is not, however, a numerous body, and makes no attempt to increase its numbers beyond a convenient limit."


In his book The New Despotism, Lord Hewart, written in 1929, revealed the serious nature of the Fabians involvement in the British government: "A mass of evidence establishes the fact that there is in existence a persistent and well-contrived system, intending to produce, and in practice producing, a despotic power which at one and the same time places Government departments beyond the sovereignty of Parliament and beyond the jurisdiction of the Courts."


It is evident that the expansion of the Fabian Socialist Plan has been successfully extended to the United States with the primary push during the Administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 30s and 40s. Needless to say, the Fabians had a direct influence on Woodrow Wilson and the creation of several pieces of legislation, including the Federal Reserve Act, as well as the 16th and 17th Amendments; all of which set the stage for every component for the future implementation of the Fabian Plan. The primary influence on Wilson was Colonel Edward Mandell House, the Fabian who was influential in the founding of the Council on Foreign Relations along with the bankers: J. P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Bernard Baruch, Otto Kahn, Jacob Schiff and Paul Warburg. As we know, House was also heavily involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank, the Round Table Group and the forerunner of the United Nations, the League of Nations. All, each and every one of these institutions, including any ancillary organizations, is completely Fabian in concept, ideology and agenda.


"The crisis [the Great Depression] discovered a great man in Franklin Roosevelt...None too soon he has carried America forward to the second stage of democratic realization. His New Deal involves such collective controls of the national business that it would be absurd to call it anything but socialism, were it not for a prejudice lingering on from the old individualist days against that word...Both Roosevelt and Stalin were attempting to produce a huge, modern, scientifically organized, socialist state, the one out of a warning crisis and the other out of a chaos..." H.G. Wells The Fate of Man 1939


Now, another extremely important point of understanding of the Fabian Socialist can be found in a book by Colonel House called Philip Dru: Administrator. In this book Colonel House describes the political agenda of the Fabians in the implementation of the New World Order under the Administration of the Fabian Socialists. It is a very scary scenario and the strategies found in this book have been enacted, step by step, stage by stage, ever since it was written. Within it can be found the plan of having a small, select group of powerful insiders causing a depression which compels the country to elect a man who just happens to talk to the people in what is called "fireside chats" in which this newly elected president will introduce and launch a plan called "The New Era".[now remember this book was written in 1912] From that point, these insiders [Fabians]control the government, control the banks and corporations, weaken the country to the point that there is a very real chance of society splitting in civil war, at which point a dictatorship is imposed on the justification of keeping the country together. The character in the book that assumes dictatorial power is named Philip Dru, the Administrator.


There is absolutely no doubt that the implementation of the New Deal was nothing more than that of the Fabian Socialist Plan. The Fabian Political and Economic Planning Committee proved indispensable in the formation of the New Deal, in fact if you read what the New Deal accomplished and compare it to the Fabian P.E.P. they are almost indistinguishable from each other. A portion of the Fabian P.E.P. stated: "The individualistic manufacturer and farmer will be forced by events to submit to far-reaching changes in outlook and methods. What is required, if with only a view to equitable treatment of individuals, is transfer of ownership of large blocks of land - not necessarily of all the land in the country, but certainly a large proportion of it - into the hands of the proposed statutory corporations and public utility bodies and of land trusts."


Another principal instrument used in the New Deal creation was the monetary and economic policies proposed by John Maynard Keynes and the Marxist Dexter White. White, of course, played a primary role in the development of the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1944 and the establishment of the IMF. In fact, White was later appointed the Director of the IMF by President Truman.


The great American Patriot John T. Flynn stated in his book entitled The Road Ahead that there was a "creeping revolution" taking place in the United States and made a clear connection between Fascism and Fabian Socialism when he said: ". . . the line between Fascism and Fabian Socialism is very thin. Fabian Socialism is the dream. Fascism is Fabian Socialism plus the inevitable dictator."


The Fabian Socialist have intentionally presented their ideology within a very socially acceptable package; humanitarian in appearance and approach, its actual purpose is complete, absolute power over society as administered through an iron fist covered in a kid-skin glove.


John Maynard Keynes promoted his services as a capitalist economist, but the reality of his politics and his economics were far from capitalistic. One Fabian Socialist by the name of John Strachey was very clear about the true intentions of Keynesian Economics and monetary policy. He proposed Keynesian policies as "an indispensable step in the right direction. The fact that the loss of objectivity, and the intrinsic value of the currency which is involved (i.e., inflation) will sooner or later make necessary, on pain of ever-increasing dislocation, a growing degree of social control . . . for the partial character of the policy will itself lead on to further measures. The very fact that no stability, no permanently workable solution can be found within the limits of this policy will ensure that once a community has been driven by events to tackle its problems, in this way, it cannot halt at the first stage, but must of necessity push on to more thorough going measures of re-organization."


Keynes stated: "Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth. Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become 'profiteers,' who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery."


Sounds like a familiar process doesn't it? The fact is that the Fabians have been in, in one degree or another, control of this country since at least the later part of the 1800s, some may say since 1860 with the nationalist putsch by Lincoln [who was influenced by Marxists from the failed revolution of 1848] and have continued to press their agenda into a Socialist society.


Perhaps one of the most important points to understand is the purpose of the central banking system and the fiat monetary system to the Fabian Socialist New World Order Plan. As explained by H.G. Wells, in his 1930 book entitled The New World Order:


"we grasp this not very obscure truth that there can be, and are, different sorts of money dependent on the economic usages or system inoperable, which are not really interchangeable, then it becomes plain that a collectivist world order, whose fundamental law is such a Declaration of Rights as we have sketched, will have to carry on its main, its primary operations at least with a new world money, a specially contrived money, differing in its nature from any sort of money conventions that have hitherto served human needs. It will be issued against the total purchasable output of the community in return for the workers' services to the community."


H.G. Wells described that as a part, one of the primary parts of the Fabian New World Order's Plan was the contrivance of a monetary system that would be issued, through a central banking system, against the total productive output of the society exchangeable in return for labor. The description is striking because what it denotes is a monetary system where there is no real value to the money itself, in other words a fiat currency, but the "value" would be the production of labor. Now, if you put this together with the quotes from Keynes, you will quickly see that the key to their plan was a highly centralized government with a highly centralized banking system issuing a monetary unit, which through the instrument of inflation, would be reduced from an actual value to a value based solely upon the exchange of labor. This was a truly socialistic concept, that inflation would be used to transform the sound monetary system of the United States into a socialistic monetary system where the exchange rate is the actual labor of the population. Today, that is what we have, our money has no value, but it is exchanged based upon labor.


I realize that many think this current economic down-turn is just the New World Order simply playing the next stage in their plans to impose a complete socialistic society during this latest economic crisis, but in my research I see a very different story. Based on the Fabian Socialist Political and Economic Planning Committee, the New World Order has made no other plans for another monetary system except the Fiat Monetary System and Central Banking System that are now in place and which are now in crisis. I am of the opinion that the New World Order is in trouble, the elite is in trouble because the system that they have spent at least the last 95 years investing all of their power, their time, their resources and intellect in is rapidly approaching a period of time when it will completely collapse. For decades they have pressed their plans, all based on a socialistic vision of creating little more than a feudal system of peonage where the people make up the productive base of their wealth through a system of confiscation and transference from the people themselves into the coffers of the Elite Administrators. Their Socialist Empire is completely built upon and dependent on the continuation of this system; the only system left to them would be a system of complete slavery and that is untenable and totally non-conducive to their plans of Socialism because it would not allow for the continued productive transfer of wealth as the current system allows.


So, as much as these Fabian Elites have put into this system, as much as they seemed to think they could continue the control of the system and extend it globally, they appear to have deluded themselves into thinking that an economic system built solely upon the creation and extension of debt was sustainable indefinitely. The Debt Standard of Fiat Money, based upon labor exchange and debt expansion will collapse, it is a mathematical impossibility for it to continue and with that collapse the Fabian Elite will lose not only their ability to maintain their power, but they will lose their wealth and position in our country and others. Once the collapse of the monetary and economic systems occur, they will have no options left to them, there will be nothing they can do to salvage the system.


There can be no doubt that during this time of collapse the Fabian Socialists will show their true nature, the heart of which is brutal disregard of the individual. They will attempt to put a death grip on society, squeezing as much life as they can from it and will do so in the most extreme ways imaginable. We must however, never relent or retreat from our principles, from our goal of Liberty and Freedom, even when the Fabian New World Order Thugs begin their final oppressive push to retain their power and wealth.


There will be a period of chaos, during this period we must consider the Elite as absolute enemies of the People, of Liberty and Freedom. During that period we must consider such criminals the legitimate focus for the People's Justice. I personally see no other options but the total and absolute elimination of the sources of this Fabian Socialist plague from our land. Until this land is purged from the influence of this Fabian Socialist Ideology the Constitutional Republic will not be safe for Liberty and Freedom, nor will prosperity ever return as long as they remain a viable force.


Now, I leave you with these horrible thoughts from one of the Fabian Traitors, David Rockefeller: "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."


In Liberty and Eternal Vigilance,


Republicae


"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were once our countrymen."
~ Samuel Adams

Beware The Ravening Fabian Communists

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits.

Matthew 7: 15-16

It's quite staggering how blatant the Fabian symbol of the wolf in sheep's clothing is. The classic symbol of deceit and treachery is openly embraced and flaunted.

It's also amazing how little publicity the Fabian's get. We are often told how the (state controlled) BNP is a danger to the country but any imagined threat they possess is dwarfed by the very real menace of the Fabians.

Named after a Roman general famed for his 'tactics of harassment and attrition rather than head-on battles' their aim is to take gradual steps towards 'socialism' rather than the outright revolutionary approach of others on the left. Of course references to socialism are a typical deception of the Fabians. A tradition that has been continued right up to the present day, that is to disguise their true meanings and intentions. Any mention of socialism was really a veiled reference to communism. Sydney Webb, one of the founders of the Fabians, along with his wife Beatrice even wrote a book called 'Soviet Communism: A New Civilsation'. It was denounced by many for its uncritical description of Stalin's harsh and murderous regime.

The original and still standing aim, was world communism. Yet another of the many fronts that have been opened in pursuit of a totalitarian New World Order.

Below is a video recorded in the garden of another of the early Fabians, George Bernard Shaw. He's the successful playwright who made the following quote:

"I also made it quite clear that socialism means equality of income or nothing, and that under socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live you would have to live well."

As you can see from his house and gardens 'equality of income' was for the masses, not for elites (or rather useful tools of the elites) such as Shaw. Shaw seemingly had a similar distorted view of 'socialism' as the multi-millionaire, multiple property owner and fellow Fabian, Tony Blair.

The video is far from professionally done. It's in the format of a casual interview with Robert Theobald and I found it quite interesting. I certainly learned a few things and if you know very little about the Fabians it serves as a good introduction. It also joins a few of the dots connecting the likes of Common Purpose, Agenda 21 and the Frankfurt School to the Fabian agenda.

The Aristocratic Foundations of the Fabian Society

Here's another video talk by Alan Watt entitled 'Conditioning Through Entertainment'. The title is a slight misnomer in that much of the video is spent discussing the Fabian Society and the aristocratic links to its founders. It should be remembered that the Fabians were instrumental in the setting up of the Labour party and still hold great influence over it to this day. Most, if not all, prominent Labour party members are also Fabians including Gordon Brown and Tony Blair. Alan Watt discusses Tony Blair the Fabian in a bit more detail in this video.

It should be clear from this talk that the collection of aristocrats involved in the setting up and funding of the Fabians had very little in common with the ordinary working class men and women they purported to support. The Fabians, like the Labour party was set up to provide 'left' cover for the World Government, New World Order, agenda. Yet more evidence of how those on the 'left' have been duped.

Fabian quotes and quotations.

Here are just a few of the, very revealing, quotes made by various Fabians over the years.

"I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s." Bertrand Russell.

"And it seems to me perfectly in the cards that there will be within the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing … a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods." Aldous Huxley.

“The political world of the … Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments … The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms; it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of New York … The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed … It will be a world religion …The Open Conspiracy will appear first, I believe as a conscious organization of intelligent, and in some cases wealthy men, as a movement having distinct social and political aims, confessedly ignoring most of the existing apparatus of political control, or using it only as an incidental implement in the stages, a mere movement of a number of people in a certain direction, who will presently discover, with a sort of a surprise, the common object toward which they are all moving. In all sorts of ways, they will be influencing and controlling the ostensible government." H.G. Wells: “The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution”, 1928.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology....Various results will soon be arrived at: that the influence of home is obstructive....although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen .... Educational propaganda, with government help, could achieve this result in a generation. There are, however, two powerful forces opposed to such a policy: one is religion; the other is nationalism....A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government." Bertrand Russell: "The Impact of Science on Society", 1953.

Fabian Socialist Window

The Stained Glass Window From The Fabian Society: Freedom Force International.

This is the stained-glass window from the Beatrice Webb House in Surrey, England, former headquarters of the Fabian Society. It was designed by George Bernard Shaw and depicts Sidney Webb and Shaw striking the Earth with hammers to "REMOULD IT NEARER TO THE HEART'S DESIRE," a line from Omar Khayyam. Note the wolf in sheep's clothing in the Fabian crest above the globe. The window is now on display at the London School of Economics (LSE), which was founded by Sydney and Beatrice Webb.

"The window was subsequently stolen from the house in 1978," says LSE's archivist, Sue Donnelly. "It surfaced in Phoenix, Arizona, soon after, but then disappeared again until it suddenly resurfaced at a sale at Sotheby's in July 2005."

The window was purchased by the Webb Memorial Trust and now is on loan to the LSE where it is displayed in the schools Shaw Library. In April of 2006, the window was officially unvieled by a ceremony attended by British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who is a member of the Fabian Society. [1]

The Fabians originally were an elite group of intellectuals who formed a semi-secret society for the purpose of bringing socialism to the world. Whereas Communists wanted to establish socialism quickly through violence and revolution, the Fabians preferred to do it slowly through propaganda and legislation. The word socialism was not to be used. Instead, they would speak of benefits for the people such as welfare, medical care, higher wages, and better working conditions. In this way, they planned to accomplish their objective without bloodshed and even without serious opposition. They scorned the Communists, not because they disliked their goals, but because they disagreed with their methods. To emphasize the importance of gradualism, they adopted the turtle as the symbol of their movement. The three most prominent leaders in the early days were Sidney and Beatrice Webb and George Bernard Shaw. A stained-glass window from the Beatrice Webb House in Surrey, England is especially enlightening. Across the top appears the last line from Omar Khayyam:

Dear love, couldst thou and I with fate conspire
To grasp this sorry scheme of things entire,
Would we not shatter it to bits, and then
Remould it nearer to the heart's desire!

Beneath the line Remould it nearer to the heart's desire, the mural depicts Shaw and Webb striking the earth with hammers. Across the bottom, the masses kneel in worship of a stack of books advocating the theories of socialism. Thumbing his nose at the docile masses is H.G. Wells who, after quitting the Fabians, denounced them as "the new machiavellians." The most revealing component, however, is the Fabian crest which appears between Shaw and Webb. It is a wolf in sheep's clothing!

Mass Immigration And The New Tower Of Babel

Pieter Bruegel's 16th century painting of the Tower of Babel

A New World Order

This article will attempt to shine a different light on the reasons behind mass immigration and multiculturalism. As relatively long as the article is it still can do little more than give an overview of what is a difficult and sensitive subject. One thing's for sure, as with most other things, the official reasoning as to why they have been enforced on a largely unwilling public is a long way from the actual truth.

 If we are to get a better understanding about why such things as mass immigration and multiculturalism are occurring we have to realise one fundamental thing. That is that there is a clear and identifiable agenda to create a one-world government and religious system sustained and supported by a global currency and financial system. This world government is an essential component of what its proponents often refer to as a New World Order. In it, the world is to be completely restructured and national boundaries and sovereignty are, at best, to become secondary if not obliterated all together. This new paradigm is often sugar coated as 'planetary citizenship' in the 'global village' but the reality will be anything but.

This New World Order has both a temporal and a spiritual dimension to it. The temporal or political aspect is best described as a form of 21st century feudalism where a self styled 'elite' few intend to extend their current control over the individual nations of the world into a global system of enslavement over all of humanity. This 'elite' consider themselves to be 'philosopher Kings' who know what's best for the rest us, who they consider to be human cattle in need of management and control. It's strongly suspected that the main vehicle for this temporal control is to be a reformed United Nations operating through regional governments such as the European Union. Those who are the very ones responsible for the innumerable problems in the world are now in the process of offering the solutions. Solutions that ultimately serve Their needs and interests rather than that of the rest of humanity.

Acting Fabian by Carl Teichrib

This essay, taken from the 'Forcing Change' website, discusses how the influence of the Fabians has spread to the USA. Although written from an American perspective it looks at the role Gordon Brown is playing in current events. Overall, this is one of the best articles on the Fabian Socialists and their malign agenda. Definitely a recommended read.


Since January, the world’s eyes have focused on the United States’ new president, Barack Obama. This is understandable. Obama’s charisma and electioneering slogan of "change" ignited imaginations in America and around the globe. And now "change" is happening; instead of Big Government it’s Even Bigger Government, and instead of unmanageable debt levels its incomprehensible debt levels. In world affairs President Obama has taken a decidedly international-friendly approach. Even so, Barack is the new man on the block, and his public endorsement of global governance – while real and documentable[2] – is relatively mild compared to his fellow traveler across the Big Pond. So far.

If anyone has been a trumpeter for global change, it’s England’s Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Since taking office in 2007, Mr. Brown has incessantly called for a new internationalism. Listening to his speeches, it appears that the Prime Minister is more interested in supporting an empowered United Nations and European super-state, rather than advancing an independent, free, and prosperous Britain.


But does this really matter, especially to those outside of the United Kingdom?


For those living in England and the other European nations – and to a lesser extent the Commonwealth countries – Mr. Brown’s position is understood: It’s the desire to birth a successful "socialist international." However, for those residing in the United States, Gordon Brown’s name means little. After all, why should someone in Cleveland care what the Prime Minster of England says or supports?


Because the world is a much bigger place then CNN and Fox News, and England is a global leader, exerting enormous influence through its roles in the United Nations and NATO, and it’s ongoing leadership in the Commonwealth of Nations (a grouping of 53 member countries). Furthermore, it’s a major holder of US treasury securities (American debt). In fact, the United Kingdom is currently the seventh largest holder of US securities (the ten biggest holders in descending order are China, Japan, Caribbean Banking Centers, Oil exporting countries – OPEC, Brazil, Russia, the United Kingdom, Luxembourg, Hong Kong, and Taiwan).[3] Yet this pales in comparison to the role Great Britain has played as an historical driver during the past one hundred-plus years; Few other countries have fashioned the present global landscape like the British have.4

And now UK leadership is attempting to forge a path through the global economic storm. In this respect the nation holds the 2009 Chair for the Group of 20, a conglomerate of financial ministers and central bank governors from the twenty most important industrialized and developing countries. This is the principal vehicle being used to guide us through the economic hurricane, and how the world will function on the other side will reflect the G20’s vision.


So does England matter to residents of Cleveland, or anyplace else beyond the United Kingdom? It has in the past, it does today, and it will matter even more in the future. Global solutions are needed, or so we are told, to fix global problems. The headman at Number 10 Downing Street, Prime Minister Gordon Brown, firmly believes this. Moreover, he sees the crisis as an opportunity to introduce world change.


Today, his voice can be heard from the halls of the European Parliament where he recently called for the creation of a "truly global society,"[5] to the floor of the US Congress where he proclaimed that "we should seize the moment, because never before have I seen a world so willing to come together." Like a broken record he reminded Congress that "the new shared truth is that global problems need global solutions."[6]


In a perfect "Mr. Brown World," how would this look? A clue was tossed out at the 2009 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland (January 30, "Reviving Economic Growth" session). During the discussion, the moderator asked PM Brown a thinly veiled question focusing on the need for world government. The Prime Minister responded with a thinly veiled promotion of world government.


Moderator: "Prime Minister Brown, you’ve talked a lot about the need for better global governance, but the problem often is that countries don’t want to give up their sovereignty…. How can you have a global governance without global, supranational bodies that then are resented by people in your country and in mine, the United States? There’s a great suspicion of these organizations like the WTO [World Trade Organization] or the EU [European Union] anyway. Is the answer here to create more of them?"


Gordon Brown: "…you’ve got global capital markets, you’ve got global financial flows, but you’ve only got national supervisors. And it cannot work when you’ve got cross-border activities and nobody quite knows what’s happening. And then you find in a crisis, of course, that you’ve got a bank or a financial institution that is international for all its life until it finds itself in crisis, and then the only lifeline is actually national, not international. So I think people are realizing that the international cooperation that we’re talking about is essential. You’re in a global financial system, how do you ever believe that you could solve global financial crisis without having a degree of global cooperation? It seems to me absolutely obvious.


The problem is that our institutions were built in the 1940s for sheltered economies, for limited competition, for national – not global – flows of capital. So we’ve got to rebuild these institutions… That is the problem; that we haven’t got international institutions that are working well enough, even when we’re part of a global economy that everybody knows is now global and should never be anything other than global in the future. And if we don’t act, protectionist tendencies will become paramount and we will have failed in this first stage of building a new global era which I hope will end with a global economy becoming a truly global society."


Grand Designs for a Global Society.


Gordon Brown’s ideas are not unique to him. England, like America, has a long history of world government aspirations. Clarence Streit, an early advocate of a federal Atlantic Union and later a lobbyist for NATO reformation, testified to this fact in his 1941 book Union Now With Britain.

"America and Britain have each been the world’s outstanding supporters of both local and general government. No other people has proved quite so parochially-minded as each of them has been. No others have done so much to bring about world government as we Americans and British have."[7]

Over the decades American-based global leadership has included President Woodrow Wilson (creator of the League of Nations), Samuel Gompers (the International Labor Organization), Elihu Root (the World Court), Owen Young (the World Bank), and Presidents Roosevelt and Truman (the United Nations). Commenting on these earlier institutions, Clarence Streit noted the essential role of England.

"In fairness, we must also admit that it was mainly British support that enabled every one of those four invaluable experiments in world government – League, Court, Labor Organization, and Bank – to be made real, and not left on paper."[8]

Although it’s impossible to document the scope of British world-government activities within the space of a single article, an examination of some key individuals will suffice in demonstrating the historical breadth of "international thinking" within the UK.

Why is this important? Because understanding the foundation gives us an important observation platform into Gordon Brown’s vision of a "global society." And as today’s leading global government advocate – more so than President Obama, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and arguably more than UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon – Mr. Brown’s grand designs would see all of us operating under a socialist system of world management. Let’s take a very brief look at three historical figures from Britain, and their quest for a new global society.

1. H.G. Wells: The author of such classics as The Time Machine (1895), The Island of Dr. Moreau (1895), The Invisible Man (1897), and The War of the Worlds (1898) – Mr. Wells was greatly interested in the "fate of human society" and believed that human management should be approached with a degree of "science."

In 1925, Wells published a series of articles in a volume titled A Year of Prophesying, in which he called for a one-world economic and political system; "I am for world-control of production and of trade and transport, for a world coinage, and the confederation of mankind. I am for the super-State…"[9]

Keep in mind that this was during the time of the League of Nations, the first major experiment in trans-national cooperation. But H.G. Wells was not satisfied with the League. In his mind the League’s ultimate vision was being squandered.

“I am hostile to the present League of Nations because I desire the Confederation of Mankind. I do not think that the obstructive possibilities of the existing League of Nations are sufficiently understood by liberal-minded people throughout the world. I do not think they realize how effectively it may be used as a consumer and waster of the creative energy that would otherwise carry us forward towards World Confederation.

"The League of Nations that we saw in our visions in those distressful and yet creative years, 1917-1918, was to have been a real step forward in human affairs… The League we desired was to have been the first loose conference that would have ended in a federal government for the whole earth.”[10]


His approach towards the accepted sovereignty of the nation state was also antagonistic,

“The world is a patchwork of various sized internment camps called Independent Sovereign States…But a day will come… when the only passports in the world will be found alongside of Aztec idols and instruments of torture and such like relics of superstition in our historical museums.”[11]


Wells believed in and worked towards an “Open Conspiracy” of world revolution. In 1928 he published a book titled Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution, in which he claimed that a world revolution would usher in a global super-government. To Wells’ this was “the truth and the way of salvation.”[12] Consider the following excerpt from Open Conspiracy. Does it sound like today?

“The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed. It will have become a great world movement as widespread and evident as socialism and communism. It will largely have taken the place of these movements. It will be more, it will be a world religion. This large loose assimilatory mass of groups and societies will be definitely and obviously attempting to swallow up the entire population of the world and become the new human community.”[13]


Other books, such as his monumental Outline of History, pointed to the coming hope of a super-world government. However, towards the end of his life Mr. Wells’ lost much of his “Open Conspiracy” optimism. Having lived through the devastation of London’s World War II air blitz, Wells came to the realization that man’s power to wage war was too great to overcome. This conclusion was so problematic to Mr. Wells that modern editions of his Outline of History have removed his original thoughts about the anticipated world society.[14] Regardless of his changed position later in life, Mr. Wells’ earlier work played a major role in formulating a global ideology.


2. Winston Churchill: Prime Minister Churchill was and still is the most visible symbol of Britain’s stance as a sovereign nation in the heat of crisis. Because of his bulldog determination, the citizens of his country were able to rally against the Nazi assault of World War II. Today, Mr. Churchill is a flagship icon of the United Kingdom Independence Party, a pro-national, anti-European Union political body. While that figure of independence is legitimate in the context of World War II, there was much more to Mr. Churchill.[15]


It is interesting to note that while the "Bulldog" was at odds with a British political organization known as the Fabian Society, which advocated a socialist world order,16 Churchill clearly embraced a world government vision. During an early September, 1943 speech on "Anglo-American Unity" at Harvard University, Churchill stated the following,

"I am here to tell you that, whatever form your system of world security may take, however the nations are grouped and ranged, whatever derogations are made from national sovereignty for the sake of the larger synthesis, nothing will work soundly or for long without the united effort of the British and American peoples."[17]


That "system of world security" became the United Nations, of which Churchill played a fundamental role along with Stalin, Roosevelt and Truman. Churchill’s world government stance, however, really came to the forefrontafter the creation of the UN. Going further, the Bulldog directly linked a world government to the creation of a new European super state.

"The creation of an authoritative, all-powerful world order is the ultimate aim towards which we must strive. Unless some effective World Super- Government can be set up and brought quickly into action, the prospects for peace and human progress are dark and doubtful. But let there be no mistake upon the main issue. Without a United Europe there is no sure prospect of world government. It is the urgent and indispensable step towards the realization of that ideal."[18]

He also made similar remarks to an audience at Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri, and at Zurich University.[19] Churchill’s direct involvement in creating the United Nations, and his open support of an "effective World Super-Government," led the American-based World Federalist Association to list him as one of the historical leaders who paved the way for the modern world government movement.[20] Obviously there’s more to the story of Churchill than just determination and the ability to unify his country in the face of adversity. Like Wells, Churchill was committed to a larger picture of global change.


3. Bertrand Russell: Considered by many to be the most important liberal thinker of the last century, Bertrand Russell has been recognized the world over for his contributions to philosophy, politics, and peace advocacy.[21]He authored more than thirty books, lectured extensively, and openly pursued the goal of a central world authority.


Born into a long family line of liberal British politicians,[22] the young Russell likewise adopted a liberal view of the world – going so far as to philosophically embrace communism while simultaneously finding the practices of the Soviet government distasteful.[23] After visiting the Soviet Union with a specially arranged Labour Party delegation, Russell wrote; "The fundamental ideas of communism are by no means impracticable, and would, if realized, add immeasurably to the well-being of mankind."[24] This is not surprising since Russell recognized that "The true Communist is thoroughly international."[25]


Bertrand Russell also connected "population control" with radical world change. His ideas of de-population had a distinctively apocalyptic ring. Consider an excerpt from a lecture given at the Royal Society of Medicine in London, England.

"I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s."[26]


Russell continued by offering a global solution to the global problem.

"…unless there is a world government which secures universal birth control, there must from time to time be great wars, in which the penalty of defeat is widespread death by starvation…The two great wars that we have experienced have lowered the level of civilization in many parts of the world, and the next is pretty sure to achieve much more in this direction. Unless, at some stage, one power or group of powers emerges victorious and proceeds to establish a single government of the world with a monopoly of armed force, it is clear that the level of civilization must continually decline…"

The need for a world government, if the population problem is to be solved in any humane manner, is completely evident on Darwinian principles.[27]
Russell’s thoughts on tyranny were equally disturbing.

"Given a stable world-organization, economic and political, even if, at first, it rested upon nothing but armed force, the evils which now threaten civilization would gradually diminish, and a more thorough democracy than that which now exists might become possible. I believe that, owing to men’s folly, a world-government will only be established by force, and will therefore be at first cruel and despotic. But I believe that it is necessary for the preservation of a scientific civilization, and that, if once realized, it will gradually give rise to the other conditions of a tolerable existence.[28]


"Tolerable" to who? Those who hold the ultimate authority of life and death in a global regime? Remember, this man is considered to be one of the greatest thinkers of the twentieth century. Interestingly, Russell also viewed the educational arena to be part of this global authoritarian control structure,

"…physiology [the science of the functions of living organisms] will in time find ways of controlling emotion, which is scarcely possible to doubt. When that day comes, we shall have the emotions desired by our rulers, and the chief business of elementary education will be to produce the desired disposition…The man who will administer this system will have a power beyond the dreams of the Jesuits…"[29]


Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s message of a "global society" is rooted in a movement that spans over 100 years, covering H.G. Wells, Churchill, and Russell. But there’s another connection that goes beyond visionary aspirations – one that marries the intellectual ideal of a world community with actual political power.


Fabian Brown.


For over a century, the Fabian Society – mentioned earlier in this article – has advanced socialism at the British national level and beyond. Its symbol was and is the tortoise, a proclamation that "slow and steady" wins the race. But what is the finish line?


One of the most remarkable exposés done on the Fabian Society was the 1968 book, Fabian Freeway by Rose L. Martin.[30] Rose clearly documents that the Fabians’ goal is international socialism, and connected the group to a host of interlocking organizations and movements working for similar ends. It’s not surprising to learn then, that H.G. Wells was a member of the Society – although he quit the group in frustration over its methodology – and that Bertrand Russell was part of the Fabians for a period.


Since it’s inception in the mid 1880s, the Fabian Society has been the heartbeat of England’s intellectual and political movement for international socialism. The Society spawned the London School of Economics (LSE), a globally recognized university focusing on economic, political, and social issues. In fact, on April 20, 2006, Prime Minister Tony Blair unveiled "the lost Fabian window" during a ceremony at the LSE. This stained glass window shows Fabian leaders using hammers to pound a globe positioned on an anvil: it’s the remaking of the world.[31] Along the top of the window is the phrase; "Remold It Nearer To The Hearts Desire." H.G. Wells is seen in one corner of the picture, and a group of members are praying to a stack of social theory texts.


What’s really remarkable is the coat of arms hanging over the re-forged globe: A wolf in sheep’s clothing. This window was first unveiled by Labour Prime Minister Clement Attlee, who held the PM’s office from 1945 to 1951, and then the framed glass was re-instated in 2006 by another Labour leader, Mr. Blair.[32] This shouldn’t be a surprise; after all, the Fabian Society was the primary designer of the Labour Party. As Fabian founder Sidney Webb explained regarding the Labour/Fabian connection; "the Fabian Society participated in the very first [Labour] meeting; and has ever since formed a constituent part of the organization."[33] Hence, from the Party’s inception, all Labour Prime Ministers have been members of the Fabian Society.[34]


This intimate connection between the Fabians and Labour explains why the Labour Party Election Manifesto of 1964 is so…blatant.

"…Labour always…remained faithful to its long-term belief in the establishment of east-west co-operation [Note: this refers to Russia and the West] as the basis for a strengthened United Nations developing towards world government…

"For us world government is the final objective – and the United Nations the chosen instrument by which the world can move away from the anarchy of power politics towards the creation of a genuine world community and the rule of law."[35]


Other Labour Party Election Manifestos speak of forming a world community, empowering the United Nations, and upholding a system of binding international laws: This is global governance – the centre piece of world management. No wonder PM Brown has made so many statements over the past two years advocating a global society – it’s the heart of his Party and the bedrock of the Fabian ideal. As Brown explained in the 2008 Kennedy Memorial lecture in Boston,

"For the first time in history we have the opportunity to come together around a global covenant, to reframe the international architecture and build a truly global society."[36]


Wells, Churchill, Russell, and the Fabian fathers would be proud. Brown and his comrades are telling those who have ears to hear: The "global society" that has been long dreamed of is very near.


Wake up, Britain. Wake up America. Wake up Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and all those who value freedom.


"Change" is coming.

"Illuminism and the Master Plan for World Domination" by David Rivera

The Modern History Project has placed the text of "Illuminism and the Master Plan for World Domination" by David Rivera online. This was done because it was their opinion 'that the book presents a basically accurate account of the historic events discussed, and provides a good overview of the topic'. It comes complete with hyperlinks to the MHP database which makes it an excellent source of information.

This book contains some excellent information about a variety of subjects including Freemasonry, the Fabians, Banking and both World War's One and Two.

Is Nick Griffin A Freemason (Why The New World Order Needs The BNP)?

Asking if Nick Griffin is a Freemason may seem like an odd question to ask, but if the answer is yes then it seems almost certain that the BNP is what’s referred to as ‘controlled opposition’.

When I first started investigating the New World Order, or world government, agenda a few things became clear quite quickly. One of which was that throughout history the elite controllers of the enslavement system we live in have always planned very far ahead and attempted (and usually succeeded) in controlling both sides of any situation.

This is necessary in order to benefit from one of their favoured techniques known as the Hegelian dialectic. In short the theory is that a thesis results in a reaction, or anti-thesis and the resulting tension between the two is resolved by the synthesis. Those behind the drive for a NWO realised that if you  can control both the thesis and the anti-thesis then you are also able to control the outcome or synthesis. This being one of the key ways the agenda is advanced.

It is especially true of politics where it seems clear that all the major political parties are controlled to some degree. Our ‘democracy’ is little more than a charade or theatre for the masses. We have the Labour/ left/international Marxists (thesis) and the Conservative/right/globalist capitalists (anti-thesis) both played off against each other to give the illusion of democracy and to further the agenda. What it seems we actually have is a shadow government that is perpetually in power and that is controlled by, and operates in the interests of, a parasitical elite few and their acolytes. The politicians that we assume are in power are mostly either puppets or dupes.

The History Of The Decline And Fall Of The British Empire

Wayne Rooney is dragged off the Old Trafford pitch
after making the fatal error of missing a penalty

In the Piers Morgan post I linked to an article on the Cutting edge website that looked at the occult nature of the Olympic Games. The article refers to a book, published sometime between 1776 and 1788, by Edward Gibbons entitled 'The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'. Apparently it was in six volumes and Gibbons was 'universally hailed as achieving his objective brilliantly'.

The reason this book is mentioned in the article is because its author makes a case for it being not only a description of how and why the Roman Empire fell but also 'a document which detailed precisely how a successful and powerful Empire could be subverted and destroyed'. The inference made in the article is that this book may well have been referred to by Adam Weishaupt of the Bavarian Illuminati as he was formulating his plans for the subversion of the 'West'.

Of course I have no idea if this is true or not but what caught my eye was the five summations of the reasons why the Roman Empire fell. It seems to me we can see all five being rigorously followed today. The five reasons are listed below along with a few observations of my own.

1. The dramatic increase of divorce undermined the institution of the family.

We have certainly seen a dramatic increase in divorce in recent times but that is only one of many ways in which the family as an institution is coming under sustained attack.

2. The imposition of higher taxes undermined the economic stability and vitality of the Empire. Why were the taxes raised to such ruinous levels? To pay for deficit government spending, to pay for food for all in society and to pay for government-sponsored activities of diversion, such as circuses and sports. Interestingly, as the time of the final collapse drew closer, greater emphasis was placed on sports, to divert the attention of the public from the distressing news of massive trouble within the Empire.

Only last week we've seen the EU tax known as VAT rise to 20%. The VAT rise is being touted as one of the ways we can 'bring down the deficit' so again we can see a distinct correlation between now and the end of the Roman Empire. Of course this is only one small way in which the 'economic stability and vitality' of this country is being undermined.  Another being the slow and intentional dismantling of our manufacturing base. The elites have certainly become more sophisticated in their ability to subvert and destroy in this regard.

Even more alarming is the observation that sports were used to distract the public as the Empire began its collapse. Apart from the usual never ending cycle of live and recorded sporting events, with football being the most evident, we are now being hyped up ready for the coming 2012 Olympics. The very event the Cutting Edge article was referring to.

3. The drive for personal pleasure had become very intense, even to the point of obsession. Gibbons noted that, at the very end, sports had become more exciting and brutal.

There can be no denying the hedonistic and materialistic nature of much of society in present days. It should be remembered that in Roman times there weren't distractions such as films, TV, radio, magazines, computer games etc. Certainly many computer games could be described as 'exciting and brutal' as could much of the output of Hollywood and the TV industry.

4. People lost their faith, both religiously and in their government. Paganism gave way to Christianity and the efficient Roman Government gave way to chaos and disintegration.

I don't consider the Christianity of the Roman Empire to be true Christianity in any meaningful sense. It had, by then, been largely captured and manipulated by the Roman elite into a control system, with Pagan overtones, for the masses. In present times it is Christianity itself that is under attack in a variety of ways. It remains to be seen what 'they' want to replace it with. It certainly looks like Islam (a control system par excellence) could be a candidate, although it could well be merely one part of a dialectic that sees some sort of world religion emerge from the engineered collapse.

5. Hidden conspirators were working within the government to secretly destroy it. They worked quietly, invisibly and deceitfully; during the entire time they were secretly dismantling the government of the Roman Empire, they publicly proclaimed their unswerving support of it. 

There are hidden conspirators and those that are not so hidden. Fabians, Bilderbergers, members of Chatham House, Common Purpose, the list is extensive. All of these organisations and the people involved in them are clearly working to destroy this country. Who can deny that the likes of Blair, Brown, Mandelson, Cameron, Clegg, Clarke and all the way back to Heath and probably beyond, have been dismantling the government of this country while publicly proclaiming their unswerving support of it?

I suspect that it wasn't only Adam Weishaupt that studied this book, or at least utilised its conclusions via other sources. Much of the above and more have been the hallmarks of the Cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School in their endeavour to subvert and destroy the West.

I'm constantly staggered by those who are blinkered (or brainwashed) enough to think we are 'progressing' towards some sort of Utopia when all the evidence points in the opposite direction. Britain is being deliberately subverted and destroyed and the sooner those that are living in denial realise this, the sooner we can expose the 'hidden conspirators' behind it. Only when this is done do we have any hope of living in a sane, balanced, healthy and peaceful country.

Lucifer Rising

The article below by Philip Jones ends with the following conclusion. Many of those in positions of power, influence and control in the world today appear to be intent on creating a "hell on earth in the shape of a diabolical One World tyrannical state, and [that] the United Nations is [to be] the international temple at which humanity, through it's political and religious leaders pays homage to … the Light Bearer - Lucifer." Like the author himself, if not too long ago someone had said such a thing to me, I too would have "raised an eyebrow or two, and politely or not, dismissed the idea." Not any more.

It is, of course, becoming obvious to many that we are being manipulated into a World Government. What's less apparent is the spiritual dimension to this enterprise. The essay below is a look at how the New Age movement is an intrinsic element to the New World Order and how both link to Theosophy, Freemasonry (and even the Fabian Society) and ultimately the worship of Lucifer. Jones asserts that "Lucifer is real, and is here on earth, in this dimension [and] is causing havoc and chaos in an attempt to seat himself, or his proxy on the throne of a World State, and to inaugurate a New Religion with himself it's sole deity." Again, a difficult thing to comprehend but who knows.

He describes the `Plan` as ushering in a "Harmonic Convergence," that is sometimes also referred to "as the Omega, Mind Convergence, Fusion or Turning Point (I'd add Consciousness Shift and the Awakening to this list)." This can occur only when nations put aside their differences in a "New World Order" of global unity. Here we see the source of the 'oneness agenda' pursued by both New Agers and leaders of the 'truth movement' such as David Icke.