What Gordon Brown Is Prepared To Do For His New World Order

There are still many people who doubt that there's an agenda to create a world government. Maybe the video below will change their mind?

Whether or not Gordon Brown's admission that 'they' invaded Iraq because Saddam Hussain was getting in the way of 'their' attempts to 'create' a New World Order will change anybody's mind remains to be seen.

Perhaps we should ask ourselves who exactly are the 'they' that are involved in this New World Order agenda? Certainly George Bush senior has spoken about it, as well as such divergent characters as Henry Kissinger, Mikhail Gorbachev, Barack Obama, David Cameron and the Pope.

Was the creation of a New World Order in the Labour party manifesto? A clearly defined policy that could be debated and discussed. Does anyone seriously doubt that the PTB in this country are manipulating us into a totalitarian world government of their design?

There's something that can be gleaned from Brown's statement. What was done to Iraq wasn't about bringing freedom or democracy. We also now know that the evidence for there being any weapons of mass destruction was either weak or non existent. What the invasion of Iraq was about was removing an obstacle to their plans for a world government.

In order to achieve their aims they were happy to inflict hundreds of thousands of deaths and the untold suffering of many more. In fact it was much worse than even that. Anthony Lawson touches on it in this excellent short video*.

One example of the many horrors that Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and the rest of the Labour cabinet were prepared to inflict on Iraq was the use of bombs containing 1.9 metric tons of depleted uranium. That figure is dwarfed by the amount dropped by the Americans but is still bad enough. The results of such a policy can be seen in the picture to the right. A quick search in Google images will provide many more examples. These things are done in our name.

We can only wonder how the likes of Brown and Blair can sanction such things. Is it something in their psychological make up? Do they lack empathy? Perhaps it has something to do with their involvement with freemasonry? There's powerful evidence to suggest that the higher levels of freemasonry worship Lucifer and/or Satan. However strange this may seem the evidence put forward is compelling and it certainly seems to fit with the behaviour of people who are only too willing to cause such death, destruction and suffering in what was quite clearly an unnecessary war.

Last week we saw a great deal of fuss about Nick Griffin being barred from a garden party at the Palace. It's my contention that Griffin is a state asset but, assuming that he wasn't and he really was the big bad fascist bogey man he's made out to be, has he done anything that can come remotely close to the crimes committed by Blair and Brown? Not only is the Queen more than happy to meet them and shake their hands, the troops that are sent to kill and be killed swear loyalty to her. There's as much blood on her hands as there is on theirs.

Do you really want to live in a New World Order created and controlled by these evil monsters? 

* Lawson links the invasion of Iraq to Zionist policy and Israel. Whilst Zionism is a powerful element in the drive to create a New World Order it's my contention that it would be wrong to consider this as a solely Jewish plot. Although there are many who 'say they are Jews but who are not' involved, it's my considered opinion that all roads lead to Rome.

The Scientific Dictatorships Of The Future

Aldous Huxley was the grandson of 'Darwin's bulldog' Thomas Huxley and the brother of Julian Huxley who, amongst other things, became the first director of UNESCO in 1948. He is perhaps best known for his book 'Brave New World', published in 1932, which was his vision of a future society. 


Huxley gave the speech linked to below in 1962. At this time his ideas about what the future would hold had developed. He discusses what he calls the 'scientific dictatorships of the future'. Whilst not appearing to be as enthusiastic for this as Bertrand Russell it should be remembered that he was very much a part of the elite. What he says can, though, be taken as a warning. Although it can't really be doubted that much of what he describes has already come to pass.


I tend to agree with Huxley in his assessment that scientific dictatorships would much prefer the techniques he discusses than the more direct methods outlined by George Orwell in 1984. Not for any moral reasons but for the purely practical reason outlined in the quote below. It should also be noted that, in his typical ambivalent style, Huxley also suggests the best way of defeating this nightmare.


"Only a large-scale popular movement toward decentralization and self-help can arrest the present tendency toward statism... A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers."

The Communist Takeover Of The West

In this video we see Russian and former KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov discussing the four stages of a Communist takeover of a country.

The four stages are demoralisation, crisis, normalisation and destabilisation. It's argued that a similar process is currently being undertaken in the United States. It's worth remembering that Communism was funded by the international bankers, both being controlled by the global oligarchy attempting to inflict a New World Order or world government on humanity.

The video sees things from a US perspective, specifically the Obama administration. From our perspective in the UK we appear to be on the cusp of the demoralisation and crisis stages. 

Of course this is but one element of the false left/right dialectic but it is the one that captures and dupes those of a 'left wing' leaning into pursuing the 'internationalist Marxist' (NWO) dream (nightmare). For any Marxists or other enthusiastic 'lefties' who think all this will turn out in your favour you'd better watch the video. It won't.

The Meaning Of Austerity

This short video explains what is really meant by the word 'austerity'. Though it doesn't touch on the details of the scam that it is the international banking system it does explain some of the consequences of it. Not least those inflicted by the World Bank and IMF.

Do we sit back and take it or follow the example of the people of Iceland as outlined in the video? I'd like to think we will but I suppose it all depends on how painful the 'austerity' measures are. Will they be enough to shake people out of their TV and media induced stupor? We'll see.