The UN and the Occult Agenda

This is really another exercise in 'dot connecting' and continues in a similar theme to the last few posts. When I first began to investigate what I suppose is best described as the New World Order, I saw it as a largely political agenda. That being the destruction of the sovereign nation states and the subsequent creation of a world government. I could see that various occult secret societies were involved but I saw those  merely as the means to create the world government end. I could also see that the creation of a world religion was on the agenda but I tended to think of that as merely a method of control and not much more.


The more I looked into things the clearer it became that there was indeed a 'spiritual' aspect of the New World Order agenda and if anything it is actually the most important of all. What also became clear was that this 'spiritual' dimension is Luciferian. 


The video below is of a lecture by Professor Walter J. Veith. He has done some fantastic research into the NWO agenda and particularly its underlying 'spiritual' nature. Veith is a Christian and his lectures reflect this but if you shy away from anything 'religious' it doesn't take anything away from the evidence he presents. 


Watch Walter Veith - UN and Occult Agenda 92 min.wmv in Faith & Lifestyle  |  View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com

The lecture is entitled 'The UN and the Occult Agenda'. Along the way we learn many fascinating things including the fact that Arthur Balfour (instrumental in both the creation of the League of Nations and the State of Israel) initiated a group called 'The Synthetic Society' whose goal was to create a 'one world religion'. However a far more interesting figure was former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations, Robert Muller. Ominously he is quoted, by Doug L. Kinman in the 'World's Last Dictator, as saying:

What Gordon Brown Is Prepared To Do For His New World Order

There are still many people who doubt that there's an agenda to create a world government. Maybe the video below will change their mind?

Whether or not Gordon Brown's admission that 'they' invaded Iraq because Saddam Hussain was getting in the way of 'their' attempts to 'create' a New World Order will change anybody's mind remains to be seen.

Perhaps we should ask ourselves who exactly are the 'they' that are involved in this New World Order agenda? Certainly George Bush senior has spoken about it, as well as such divergent characters as Henry Kissinger, Mikhail Gorbachev, Barack Obama, David Cameron and the Pope.

Was the creation of a New World Order in the Labour party manifesto? A clearly defined policy that could be debated and discussed. Does anyone seriously doubt that the PTB in this country are manipulating us into a totalitarian world government of their design?

There's something that can be gleaned from Brown's statement. What was done to Iraq wasn't about bringing freedom or democracy. We also now know that the evidence for there being any weapons of mass destruction was either weak or non existent. What the invasion of Iraq was about was removing an obstacle to their plans for a world government.

In order to achieve their aims they were happy to inflict hundreds of thousands of deaths and the untold suffering of many more. In fact it was much worse than even that. Anthony Lawson touches on it in this excellent short video*.

One example of the many horrors that Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and the rest of the Labour cabinet were prepared to inflict on Iraq was the use of bombs containing 1.9 metric tons of depleted uranium. That figure is dwarfed by the amount dropped by the Americans but is still bad enough. The results of such a policy can be seen in the picture to the right. A quick search in Google images will provide many more examples. These things are done in our name.

We can only wonder how the likes of Brown and Blair can sanction such things. Is it something in their psychological make up? Do they lack empathy? Perhaps it has something to do with their involvement with freemasonry? There's powerful evidence to suggest that the higher levels of freemasonry worship Lucifer and/or Satan. However strange this may seem the evidence put forward is compelling and it certainly seems to fit with the behaviour of people who are only too willing to cause such death, destruction and suffering in what was quite clearly an unnecessary war.

Last week we saw a great deal of fuss about Nick Griffin being barred from a garden party at the Palace. It's my contention that Griffin is a state asset but, assuming that he wasn't and he really was the big bad fascist bogey man he's made out to be, has he done anything that can come remotely close to the crimes committed by Blair and Brown? Not only is the Queen more than happy to meet them and shake their hands, the troops that are sent to kill and be killed swear loyalty to her. There's as much blood on her hands as there is on theirs.

Do you really want to live in a New World Order created and controlled by these evil monsters? 

* Lawson links the invasion of Iraq to Zionist policy and Israel. Whilst Zionism is a powerful element in the drive to create a New World Order it's my contention that it would be wrong to consider this as a solely Jewish plot. Although there are many who 'say they are Jews but who are not' involved, it's my considered opinion that all roads lead to Rome.

The Communist Takeover Of The West

In this video we see Russian and former KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov discussing the four stages of a Communist takeover of a country.

The four stages are demoralisation, crisis, normalisation and destabilisation. It's argued that a similar process is currently being undertaken in the United States. It's worth remembering that Communism was funded by the international bankers, both being controlled by the global oligarchy attempting to inflict a New World Order or world government on humanity.

The video sees things from a US perspective, specifically the Obama administration. From our perspective in the UK we appear to be on the cusp of the demoralisation and crisis stages. 

Of course this is but one element of the false left/right dialectic but it is the one that captures and dupes those of a 'left wing' leaning into pursuing the 'internationalist Marxist' (NWO) dream (nightmare). For any Marxists or other enthusiastic 'lefties' who think all this will turn out in your favour you'd better watch the video. It won't.

Is Nick Griffin A Freemason (Why The New World Order Needs The BNP)?

Asking if Nick Griffin is a Freemason may seem like an odd question to ask, but if the answer is yes then it seems almost certain that the BNP is what’s referred to as ‘controlled opposition’.

When I first started investigating the New World Order, or world government, agenda a few things became clear quite quickly. One of which was that throughout history the elite controllers of the enslavement system we live in have always planned very far ahead and attempted (and usually succeeded) in controlling both sides of any situation.

This is necessary in order to benefit from one of their favoured techniques known as the Hegelian dialectic. In short the theory is that a thesis results in a reaction, or anti-thesis and the resulting tension between the two is resolved by the synthesis. Those behind the drive for a NWO realised that if you  can control both the thesis and the anti-thesis then you are also able to control the outcome or synthesis. This being one of the key ways the agenda is advanced.

It is especially true of politics where it seems clear that all the major political parties are controlled to some degree. Our ‘democracy’ is little more than a charade or theatre for the masses. We have the Labour/ left/international Marxists (thesis) and the Conservative/right/globalist capitalists (anti-thesis) both played off against each other to give the illusion of democracy and to further the agenda. What it seems we actually have is a shadow government that is perpetually in power and that is controlled by, and operates in the interests of, a parasitical elite few and their acolytes. The politicians that we assume are in power are mostly either puppets or dupes.

They Thought They Were Free (But Then It Was Too Late).

Some may scoff at any attempt to draw parallels with the situation here in the Britain of 2010 and the Germany of the 1930's. The excerpt below is taken from pages 166-73 of "They Thought They Were Free", by Milton Mayer, first published in 1955. I came across it on the Information Clearing House website. As I read through it I couldn't help but feel that though the circumstances are very different we really are experiencing something very similar. At least those of us who look beyond the spin, lies and manipulation of the mainstream media are. I suspect the parallels will be even more evident should the (predicted) conflict in the Middle East, they appear to be preparing us for, break out and widen.




"What no one seemed to notice," said a colleague of mine, a philologist, "was the ever widening gap, after 1933, between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know, it doesn’t make people close to their government to be told that this is a people’s government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing, to do with knowing one is governing.

"


What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.

"

Free trade For Global Depression

The Rise Of The Financial Empire

Below is an excellent series of videos that manage to perfectly encapsulate what is really going on in the world today. As is often the case they are largely from an American perspective but the subject broadens to take in the rest of the world as well. Besides, the system that's described as operating in America is based upon that in the UK. The central banks work in a slightly different way but apart from that the rest is pretty much the same.

The author is a Damon Vrabel who once served the financial empire he describes but now works as a writer and 'post-neoclassical economic philosopher'.

The subjects covered include the disastrous banking system we currently operate under, the myth of free enterprise and how society is structured in a pryramidical fashion. The great mass of people being the servants (slaves) of a parasitical elite.

As he points out this is no 'conspiracy theory'. What he gives you are hard facts based on mathematical calculations. This should convince even the most sceptical out there that, at the very least, all is not what it seems. I can't recommend these videos highly enough.




Video two

Video three

Video four

Video five

Video six

Video seven

Video eight

Video nine

Video ten

The Charade Called Democracy

In his acceptance speech in 1992, American President Bill Clinton described Professor Quigley as his mentor and an important influence on his life. Quigley wrote several books including 'Tragedy & Hope: A History of The World in Our Time'.

On page 1247 he went some way towards exposing the charade that is the two (main) party political system.

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy."

I'd Love To See This On Billboards Across The Country

I had no intention of posting much about the charade that is the 'election'. Any solution to our current predicament will not be found at the ballot box. We don't have a 'democracy' we have a de-facto dictatorship. That said this poster, courtesy of the International Mens Organisation caught my eye. It pretty much sums up the 'choice' we are, effectively, being given.

The Real Truth Concerning How The Earth Is Ruled by Timothy K. Perry

The article below first appeared on the Nolan Chart website but has since been removed. As is often the case it is written from an American perspective but is still pertinent and valuable to those of us in the UK. It serves as a short and simple introduction to the way things really operate. At least on a political level.


"It's not a secret about what group really controls the world, and is responsible for instituting and manipulating political parties, but most people refuse to acknowledge it.


It truly amazes me when people continue to think in terms of Democrat, Republican or left-wing and right-wing. Why? Both carefully created polarities are financed, controlled and operated by the same oligarchical globalist order which has been patiently constructing and deconstructing nations, states, wars, famines, stock market rises and crashes for quite some centuries now. The modern twentieth and twenty-first century organs of this group are known to anyone who cares to do even the most basic research on the subject. The plans for global dictatorship have already been well-documented by a number of important white papers from organizations such as The Council on Foreign Relations, The Tri-Lateral Commission, The Club of Rome, The International Monetary Fund, The World Bank, The Lucis Trust (ed note: formerly Lucifer Trust), and other similar organizations (ed note: Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Fabian Society).


The ultimate goal is the creation of a one-world government and religious system sustained and supported by a uniform monetary base.


Great thinkers and artists have already been talking about the New World Order going back to H.G. Wells, (read his book "New World Order"), Aldous Huxley's ("Brave New World"), the works of Myron Fagan, Zbiginew Brezinski ("Between Two Ages"), and many others who spoke clearly of what this New Order means and even the specific ways it will be instituted into the world. President George Bush, Sr. gave that ominous speech about a "New World Order".


Let's face the facts, and these facts are not the product of wild-eyed gruel drooling "conspiracy theorists" or hermetic wackos who don't have a life. All you, esteemed reader, have to do is simply review the officially published white papers of these organizations as well as check out the straight-forward above ground statements made by a wide variety of famous well-respected international luminaries past and present. The facts can't be made more clear or obvious, unless someone was to go up to you, esteemed reader, and do a descriptive pantomime dance of the aforementioned verities described. Again, esteemed reader, I'm not hallucinating these facts. I'm not having a "bad night" after eating too many psychedelic mushrooms. Nor am I currently writing this missive from the padded cell of a mental hospital.


The late Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater wrote about the situation in his book: "With No Apologies" where he states: "The CFR is the American branch of a society (ed note: The Royal Institute of International Affairs - based in Britain and now known as Chatham House) which believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established ... What the Trilaterals truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political government of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the world ... In my view, the Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, co-ordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power: political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical" (With No Apologies, pp. 128, 284).


According to the plan, the soverign nations must by necessity, surrender sovereignty, for it must be broken down in order to properly assimilate into one cohesive globalist structure. Most shocking of all, Goldwater adds the following chilling commentary: "We have arrived at our present position of peril in the world and at home because our leaders have refused to tell us the truth ... unless we, who profess to believe in freedom, wake up, the world is headed for a period of slavery" (With No Apologies, p. 299).


In his book "Between Two Ages", Brezinski writes the following passage: "this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control." Then of course, there is Brezinski's classic work: "The Technotronic Age", which after reading it gave me nightmares for several weeks.


There exists so much above-ground material on this globalist blueprint that it would probably fill up the shelves of a good sized-library. It is quite a sobering reality to realize that every item on the agenda of this group has been fulfilled up until the writing of this retrospective. Even so, people continue to be partisan, people continue to vehemently argue their political candidate over the rival political candidate from another party. Is it not a difficult intellectual exercise to realize that all these parties have been created and controlled for obvious reasons. There is absolutely no doubt that this Luciferian group will continue to fulfill every stated item on its platform, regardless of the individual pop characters that take center stage and catch the attention of the people."

Left Wing Dupes

In an earlier post we saw the suggestion by Phillip Jones, in his essay the Nexus of Evil, that the most effective resistance to the unfolding New World Order and its Communist (left wing)/Super-capitalist (right wing) nexus (Communitarianism) was Nationalism. He also talked about the 'rootless intellectuals' being 'marshaled' against Nationalism and how it had become 'a much maligned and misrepresented political credo'.


Nationalism is the only bulwark against the New World Order and those behind it know this. A nation is its people which is one of the reasons why they have encouraged such large scale immigration in order to destabilise and weaken national identity. I should point out that moderate Nationalism isn't racism, xenophobia, fascism, extremism or Nazism. These are all the extremes that are used to denigrate and deride and have become powerful mind control 'buzz words'. All guaranteed to spring to mind when the subject of Nationalism is bought up. This is intentional because we are being slowly led into a totalitarian One World Government. Genuine Nationalism is that which operates in the interests of its sovereign peoples and which co-operates freely and willingly with all other sovereign countries.


Nationalism is being attacked in numerous ways but, as mentioned above, perhaps the most obvious one is mass immigration along with such Frankfurt School derived cultural Marxist techniques as political correctness, anti-racism and affirmative action. It should be obvious that, in addition to the age old elite tactic of divide and rule, this is a deeply wicked attempt by the PTB (powers that be) to destroy British national identity without any sort of consensus. A situation which I'm sure most ethnic minorities of good will would not wish to see happen to their country of origin or indeed to Britain for that matter. It should never be forgotten we are both victims in this drive for a One World Government.


Absolutely essential to this endeavour has been the manipulation and shaping of public perceptions and thinking (brainwashing) by the PTB. As I began to understand the broader agenda it seemed to me that the most duped of all have been the 'left' of British politics. Not least because I once considered myself to be 'left wing'.  I'm not talking about the leadership of the Labour party (I've a feeling they are brainwashed in other, more subtle, ways) but the lowly MP's, councillors, activists and general supporters.


I've long since stopped believing in the left's idea of 'progressive (another mind control buzzword) politics'. Many, if not most, of their policies were bad enough even taken at face value. What the 'left' fail to realise though is that they are being manipulated to a shocking degree as one part of a dialectic that will eventually see a super rich, blood-line elite and their minions install a 21st century form of feudalism, with the great mass of society as little more than serfs or slaves. The control system we already live under is slowly tightening its grip with the left's help and in many cases, its blessing. The system's also being slowly altered (hence the frequent political use of such terms as 'change' and 'reform')  as we are moved into the new global control system often referred to by the 'elites' as the New World Order.


I recently came across a quote that seemed to shed some light on another, important, part of the brainwashing we are subjected to. It was from a speech given at a meeting of the Church, in Crampton, in the middle of the 19th century. Some sources say that a Reverend, Dr Bramwell made the speech, others that he was the chair of the meeting and that the speech was given by a Reverend J. R. Stephens of Stalybridge. Whoever the speaker was, he said:

“The factory-law was so unblushingly violated that the chief inspector of that part of the factory district, Mr. Leonard Horner, had found himself necessitated to write to the Home Secretary, to say that he dared not, and would not send any of his sub-inspectors into certain districts until he had police protection. *** And protection against whom?  Against the factory-masters!  Against the richest men in the district, against the most influential men in the district, against the magistrates of the district, against the men who hold her Majesty’s commission, against the men who sat in the Petty Sessions as the representatives of royalty. *** And did the masters suffer for their violation of the law?  In his own district it was a settled custom of the male, and to a great extent of the female workers in factories, to be in bed from 9, 10 or 11 o’clock on Sunday, because they were tired out by the labour of the week.  Sunday was the only day on which they could rest their wearied frames. *** It would generally be found that, the longer the time of work, the smaller the wages. *** He would rather be a slave in South Carolina, than a factory operative in England.”


There are several things that can be deduced from the quote, not least the clearly described representatives of the control system we still live under today. What caught my eye the most however was the final sentence. The collective guilt all 'white' people are meant to have about the slave trade is one of the major justifications for, amongst other things, mass immigration, the cultural Marxism that goes with it, the, so called, equality agenda and the suppression of any criticism of these things. 


There are many elements of the slave trade, as taught in British schools and elsewhere, that are distorted, misrepresented or left out altogether. Most importantly though is the fact that the 'white people' responsible for the slave trade were the same small elite, largely royal and aristocratic, few whose descendants are still in control today. Nothing's changed, particularly in the sense that all these things require money. Both the slave trade and the empire were funded by the bankers. It's the financial oligarchy that controls both Britain and elsewhere that made the decisions then and continue to do so today. 


The great mass of British people were little more than slaves or serfs themselves. Whether in sweat shops or factories similar to the one described above or in earlier times on the fields of rural Britain. I'm certainly not downplaying the suffering of Africans due to the slave trade, just attempting to put it in some sort of perspective. A perspective that clearly shows that both the (white) working classes of Britain and the (black) African victims of the slave trade have a common enemy. The blood-line elites that still control this country, the Commonwealth and elsewhere and who are attempting to create a New World Order. A totalitarian system that will see us all enslaved even further than we are today.


The liberal left have been sold the idea that the world can be spilt into two, guilty oppressors ('whites') and virtuous victims (other ethnic minorities). The truth is very different. It wasn't 'white' working class factory workers that decided to create the empire, enslave 'black' Africans or go to war on numerous occasions, it was the elites who really rule this country. They are our common 'enemy'. If the 'left' wish to do something of value for both the working classes of Britain and poor people all over the world they should look no further than our banking and finance system. There's nothing that keeps the controllers in power more than the fractional reserve banking system. It allows them to create money from nothing, charge interest on every currency unit created and subsequently own and control all the major corporations. It's this same system operated by the international banking cartels through the IMF and World Bank that is the main reason why the developing world remains in a state of poverty. 


It's only when you study the New World Order agenda in some detail that this and much more can be traced back to a common source. It's from that common source that the puppet masters manipulate the sham Punch (left) and Judy (right) show we call democracy. A system designed only to distract the masses and give them the illusion they have any power.


To concur it's important for us all to realise that we have been, and continue to be, exposed to incredible levels of brainwashing, mind control and 'perception management'. None more so than on the subjects of mass immigration, political correctness, (so called) equality and affirmative action. These things may appear to be to the benefit of ethnic minorities but at best it is only a short term illusory effect in the pursuit of a long term goal. Yes the 'right' is also manipulated but perhaps not to the degree that the 'left' is. They, in particular, need to awaken from their hypnotic trance if we have any chance of escaping the New World Order trap that is being set. Britain is being subverted, divided (diversity) and destroyed. If we are to prevent this happening, not just here but elsewhere in the world, then we have to become aware of the manipulation taking place and focus on our common enemy. Once that's done the sovereign people of this country and other countries around the world can all find a way forward free from the lies and deception of a control structure that presently operates only for the benefit of the super rich bloodline elites and their paid minions and political puppets.

Drowning in a Sea of Irrelevance

Fellist, on his blog 'Songlight for Dawn', has posted several pages of Peter Hitchens' book 'The Abolition of Britain'. I have a great deal of sympathy with the ideas behind the book as the more I've researched the more I've realised that there is a clear objective of subverting and destroying Britain.

The subject of the post is, essentially, the role that television has played and continues to play, in the subversion and destruction process, both collectively and individually. I certainly recommend reading the whole thing but there was one short paragraph that stood out for me. It managed to express a conclusion that I had been slowly coming to.

"[American commentator Neil] Postman returned to the assault in Amusing Ourselves to Death, where he warned that we should not be complacent just because we had avoided George Orwell's nightmare totalitarian society, which he had predicted for 1984. What was actually coming true, he suggested, was Aldous Huxley's alternative nightmare in Brave New World, where nobody even realized that they were being oppressed.

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared that we would become a trivial culture.

Huxley, in fact, warned directly of 'man's almost infinite capacity for distractions.' Postman believes that capacity has been fully engaged in the last twenty years."

I'm not sure we have avoided Orwell's nightmare just yet. It seems to me it is being slowly constructed all around us. What is true, however, is that the overwhelming majority of people don't realise they are being slowly repressed. Mixed in with that number are some who have an idea that 'something's not quite right' but who shrug their shoulders and go back to the distractions of their choice.

Then there are the very few who both know what is going on and who are eager to do something about it. Hitchens himself would fall into this category but how many would easily dismiss anything he says as the (mind control trigger) words of a 'right winger' or 'conservative'. I know I used to.

The scariest of all is the idea that there is no need to ban books as there are very few who want to read them. I've tried countless times to interest friends and acquaintances of mine in the New World Order, World Government agenda (of which Hitchens' observations is a small part of) with little or no success. Nothing, it seems, can penetrate the need for the myriad distractions that surround them. They are, indeed, drowning in a sea of irrelevance.

I'm only grateful that I'm slowly managing to break free from it all.

The New World Order: Authoritarian Socialism Run by Monopoly Capital

Following on from the previous post I thought I'd select a few passages from Philip Jones' 'Nexus of Evil' that seem to shed some light on the close relationship between Capitalism and Communism. Let's begin with a quote from Henry Makow that Jones uses:

“The Illuminati’s `revolutionary goal` is the New World Order, or authoritarian socialism run by monopoly capital. It is big government in the service of big business. The Left in the service of the Right”.

The text in blue are a few observations of my own.

"Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state. Can anyone deny that their goals are firmly on course."

Wall Street Funded Communists (and Nazis)

The title is the assertion made by Professor Anthony Sutton in his meticulously researched book 'Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution'. The article below is taken from the Hidden Evil website and is a brief look at some of the key points made in the book. The conclusion reached is that not only was Wall Street a major funder of Communist Russia, it was the actual creator of it. Personally I suspect the bankers were acting as agents for a slightly higher authority but that doesn't detract from the ramifications of the conclusion.


In the Hidden Evil article Professor Hutton is quoted as warning:

"The synthesis sought by the Establishment is called the New World Order. Without controlled conflict this New World Order will not come about. ... And this is being done with the calculated, managed, use of conflict. ... This explains why the International bankers backed the Nazis, the Soviet Union, [and] North Korea ... against the United States. The 'conflict' ... [builds] profits while pushing the world ever closer to One World Government. The process continues today."

It certainly does continue today.

Wall Street funded Communists

Professor Sutton stated, "Western textbooks on Soviet economic development omit any description of the economic and financial aid given to the 1917 Revolution and subsequent economic development by Western Firms and banks." "In the Bolshevik Revolution we have some of the world's richest and most powerful men financing a movement which claims its very existence is based on the concept of stripping of their wealth," declared Allen. "[M]en like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Schiffs, Warburgs, Morgans, Harrimans, and Milners."

Diagram By Ivor Benson

'Cooperative' politicians

"Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

Carroll Quigley in his book Tragedy and Hope, page 324.

This politician must have been very cooperative.

Freedom is an illusion

I've seen this quote by Frank Zappa before, on several sites. It's worth repeating again though, just in case there are some who haven't already seen it. It really does sum up the world we live in.

“The Illusion of freedom will continue as long as it is profitable to continue with the Illusion. At the point where the Illusion becomes too expensive to maintain they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theatre”  

Professor Carroll Quigley quotes

In his acceptance speech in 1992, American President Bill Clinton described Professor Quigley as his mentor and an important influence on his life. Quigley wrote several books including 'Tragedy & Hope: A History of The World in Our Time'.

On page 324 of that book he wrote:

"The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

On page 1247 he went some way towards exposing the charade that is the two (main) party political system.

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy."

The Secret Government

This article 'The Secret Government' has no author credit but is worth reading for its overall view of the New World Order agenda.


A small number of extremely wealthy people, descendants of wealthy families in Europe and the U.S, own a major part of the material wealth of the world. This power is concentrated in London which is the centre of the world banking system. The control they exercise is kept within the original families and passed down from generation to generation. They are highly organised, operating in secret through a web of 'private' organisations.


This group is known as the Global Elite.


Their wealth is accumulating on a compound basis. They determine the course of history, through virtual control of the world economy.


They are working to a 'grand plan' which is now well-advanced.


The common reaction of people when first hearing of the global elite and their operations is one of disbelief and a refusal to give the claims any credibility as it appears so outrageous. But during the last few years there has been an increasing volume of books, articles and essays, all with the same story. All are based on well-documented research. The information revealed is consistent with the events of recent history, leaving no room for doubt. It is the "New World Order" taking shape - the Global Elite strategy.


For our purposes. the concentration of control over financial resources started with the Industrial Revolution. The 18th century saw the emergence and rapid rise of the House of Rothschild - the largest and most powerful financial empire - built on money embezzled by Mayer Amschel Bauer (later Rothschild) from William IV, who had stolen it from the soldiers he had hired out to the British government to fight Napoleon's armies. Rothschild sent the money to England, bought vast quantities of gold from the East Indian Company, used this to finance the Duke of Wellington's exploits and, working through the Brotherhood network, manipulated governments and created wars and revolutions. He lent money to both sides of the conflicts in what became a standard practice of the banking elite. Rothschild's influence can hardly be overstated, for it was the precursor of today's vast transnational corporations and banking empires which have extended their control to the four corners of Earth in the long-term agenda of the Brotherhood. As Historian John Reeves puts it:

Little could Mayer Amschel have anticipated that his sons would in after years come to exercise such an unbounded sway that the peace of nations would depend upon their nod; that the powerful control they exercised on the European money markets would enable them to pose as the arbiters of peace and war, since they could at their pleasure withhold or furnish the percuniary [sic] means required to carry on a campaign.

But this, incredible as it may seem, was what their vast influence, combined with their enormous wealth and unlimited credit, enabled them to do, for no firms existed strong enough to oppose them for any length of time, or rash enough to take up a business which the Rothschilds had refused. To reach this exulted position, Mayer Amschel and his sons required the cooperation of the states, but, when once he had climbed over their banks and reached the height of his ambition, he was independent of all aid and could act with the greatest freedom, whilst the states remained in a suppliant attitude at his feet.

The Rothschild approach was reportedly summed up by Mayer Amschel himself: "Give me control of a nation's currency and I care not who makes the laws." When Rothschild's son Nathan died, his eldest son, Lionel, took over, making massive loans to the British and American governments and others, including some $80 million to Britain to finance the Crimea War. Lionel was succeeded by the second Nathan, the first Lord Rothschild, who took his seat in the House of Lords in 1885. He became the governor of the Bank of England (the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street) with unlimited power over the world's financial system. That power has not diminished - far from it - it has simply expanded with new empires like that of Morgan and Rockefeller, so that in the closing decade of this century the power and the control of the world's financial system behind its many 'fronts' is completely in the hands of the Global Elite and is enormous.


But to return to the start of the Industrial Revolution. At its beginning, the ruling powers in Great Britain embarked on one of the most sustained efforts to destroy community life ever undertaken. From 1770 to 1830 some 3,280 enclosure bills were passed putting into private hands for private gain more than six million acres of commonly-held lands. By 1830 not a single country had more than three percent of its land open to public use. According to historian George Sturt:

To the enclosure of the commons more than to any other cause, may be traced all the changes which have subsequently passed over the village. It was like knocking the keystone out of an arch.

This control of finite resources, and with it the diminution of democracy, was well advanced by 1901 when Morgan and Rockefeller, who headed the two main financial groups in America, amalgamated 112 corporate directorates, combining $22.2 billion in assets - a massive sum in those days. In 1910 eight financiers, including the host, met in absolute secrecy at the private hunting club of J.P Morgan - the Jekyll Island Club off the coast of Georgia - "to shoot ducks". News of this meeting did not leak for six years, but from then on snippets of information were made public. For example, on 18 January 1920, The New York Times made a most revealing statement about the Federal Reserve System, the basic plan for which those secretive bankers had proceeded to draft back in 1910: "The Federal Reserve is the fount of credit, not of capital." This meant that Reserve notes, instead of being backed by precious metal or other suitable commodity which would provide capital funds for the betterment of industry and commerce, are backed by paper loaned at interest.


On 25 July 1921, Senator Owen stated in the same paper: "The Federal Reserve Board is the most gigantic financial power in the world. Instead of using this great power as the Federal Reserve Act intended that it should, the board ....delegated this power to the banks,...." In 1931 on 3 May, when commenting on the death of one of J.P Morgan's closest associates, The New York Times remarked: "One-sixth of the total wealth of the world was represented by members of the Jekyll Island Club." This reference was to just those men who were part of Morgan's group and members of his Club. It excluded the Rockefeller group and the European financiers. Among those "duck shooters" present back in November 1910 were Benjamin Strong, head of J.P Morgan's Bankers Trust Company and from 1914 till his death in 1928 Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank, and Paul Warburg, who not knowing one end of a gun from the other had carried a borrowed shotgun onto the train that night at Hoboken, New Jersey. Warburg, who had exceptionally powerful banking connections in New York, England, France, Germany and the Netherlands, was the real power behind the Federal Reserve throne. His brother Max was head of the German Secret Service during World War I.


J.P Morgan and his "duck shooters" proceeded to draft the basic plan for the Federal Reserve System with five objectives:

• Stop the growing competition from the nation's newer banks.
• Obtain a franchise to create money out of nothing, for the purpose of lending.
• Get control of the reserves of all the banks.
• Get the taxpayer to pick up the cartel's inevitable losses.
• Convince Congress that the purpose of the FRS was to protect the public.

It succeeded brilliantly. As Anthony Sutton remarks about one of the more blatant scams in history: "The Federal Reserve System is a legal private monopoly of the money supply operated for the benefit of the few under the guise of protecting and promoting the public interest."


Space does not permit any exploration of the secret machinations and malfeasance, including the Crash of 1929 and the Great Depression, organised by Montague Norman, Governor of the Bank of England from 1916 to 1944, and Benjamin Strong, with a little help from their friends. Nor is there room to examine the wider implications of the actions of these Robber Barons and their support for Germany in the First World War (Nurse Edith Cavell was shot by the Germans upon the insistence of the British authorities for her "inconvenient" exposure that "Belgian Relief" supplies were being shipped to Germany to feed its army), and for Hitler's subsequent rise to power.


Prior to assuming real power, Montague Norman had had a nervous breakdown in 1912 and, as was fashionable, had gone to Switzerland to be treated by Jung.

When people of this class are stricken by guilt feelings while plotting world wars and economic depressions which will bring misery, suffering and death to millions of the world's inhabitants; they sometimes have qualms. These qualms are jeered at by their peers as "a failure of nerve". After a bout with their psychiatrists, they return to their work with renewed gusto, with no further digression of pity for "the little people" who are to be their victims.

It should be noted, according to Eustace Mullins, that the same all-powerful names, the same closed shop responsible for the foundation of the Federal Reserve System, still manage the world's closely interlinked finances, "with profits for themselves but with disastrous results for everyone else".


Next we jump to Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, 1944, and the first United Nations International Monetary Conference. It hammered out the final agreement for the post-war New World Order under which in due course there would be a further massive shift in power out of the hands of nation states and democratic governments and into the hands of banks and transnational corporations. William Pitt, more than two centuries ago, summarised what has taken place: "Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it" - a dictum which is more generally known from Lord Acton's statement of 1887; "power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely."


The Bretton Woods conference also structured Anglo-American hegemony over world oil supplies and led to the creation of the all-powerful International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB) which, under the control of the US Federal Reserve System, since then, deliberately and ruthlessly, have put most of the so-called Third World into extreme debt. It has been said that the WB and IMF "have arguably done more harm to more people than any other non-military institutions in history." As Jesse Jackson put it in 1993: "They no longer use bullets and ropes. They use the World Bank and the IMF." Between 1982 and 1990, debtor countries paid back more than $1,300 billion but began the nineties 61 percent more in debt than they were in 1992. Sub-Saharan African debt alone increased by 113 percent." In 1993, for every one pound given in aid, rich nations took back 3 pounds in debt payments. Nigerian writer and environmentalist, Ken Saro-Wiwa, roundly condemned the World Bank's position:

The World Bank has to accept that its real instrument of torture is its insistence on growth, its economic theorising at the expense of human welfare...
The sooner debtor nations realise the political nature of the World Bank, the sooner they will be able to face the bogus economic theories of the Bank with an equivalent weapon -people's power.

Saro-Wiwa and eight other Ogoni activists were hanged on 10 November 1995 by Nigeria's dictator, General Abacha. In case the message is not clear, the 1988 registration of former senior IMF economist Davison Budhoo, should leave no doubt. Budhoo resigned in disgust, hoping, he said, to "wash my hands of the blood of millions of poor and starving people."

The IMF was never designed to help the Third World or end poverty. It was established by the Bretton Woods conference of 1944 to restore economic and financial order to the Western world. There was no element of compassion for humanity in its formulation. The Fund's aim is first and foremost to assure the interests of developed countries. We make or break human life every day of every year as probably no other force has ever done in the past or will ever do again.

Coupled with these two exceptionally powerful organisations are the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), formulated shortly after the WB and IMF, and finally signed in 1993, and the new World Trade Organisation (WTO) of 1995. This quadruplet is now able to enforce throughout the world the doctrine of corporate libertarianism - a transnational corporate bill of rights - and God help any country that gets in the way.


The Secret Agenda


David Icke's book "...and the Truth Shall Set You Free" lists a summary of the basic themes of the Elite's plan following World War II:

• To introduce a world authority called the United Nations (with associated bodies like the World Health Organisation), which could evolve into a world government with powers to control the lives of everyone on the planet.
• To continue to cause conflicts across the world and to use the fear of the Soviet Union to massively increase spending on nuclear weapons and 'conventional' weapons, thus adding to the terror of nuclear war and demands for global security. To set up an American-European defence alliance (which was called the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)) and a United Nations 'peace'keeping force, which, through the engineering of conflicts, would eventually be fused together to form the world army.
• To create three 'free trade' regions in Europe, the Americas, and Asia, which would be sold to people initially as merely economic groupings. Gradually, however, these would be evolved into a centralised political unions, with one central bank and one currency. These would be stepping-stones to the introduction of the same institutions on a global scale. The European Economic Community, now the European Union, was the first of these, but the other two are now underway also.
• To advance the control of public opinion and to research and expand the understanding of how to manipulate the human psyche, individually and collectively. Today this agenda includes the microchipping of people and their permanent connection to a global computer.
• To create a welfare state while destroying alternatives to the economic system and, when the desired dependency had been achieved, to dismantle that state welfare support, so creating a vast underclass without help or hope.
• To make fantastic amounts of money in the course of realising all these ambitions via the Elite-controlled companies and banks.
• To continually add to the debt burden of people, business, and state, thus increasing the control exerted over them.

The approach which was followed to hoodwink public thinking was painfully predictable, but highly effective: Discredit the nation state. This was laid out during the War by the German economist and refugee, Hans Heymann, who produced his Plan for Permanent Peace using funds given by... the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.