Pied Pipers Of The Truth Movement: Can We Add Ian R Crane To The List?

In the previous post we looked at the idea that a number of, so called, leaders of the truth movement are not quite what they appear. These included high profile, 'celebrity truthers' such as David Icke, Michael Tsarion, Jordan Maxwell and Alex Jones as well as those involved in the Zeitgeist movement.  A critical analysis of Charlie Veitch of the Love Police strongly suggested that he was one more to add to the list. This article will take a look at another UK based truth movement leader and ask the question, can he be added to that list as well?

An organisation called 'Truth Juice' opened a branch in Birmingham and their first speaker was Brian Gerrish of the UK Column and British Constitution Group. At that time I was a member of the BCG so I thought I'd go along to see his presentation. This was in December of last year (2010), after which we had a particularly cold and snowy period. It meant I was unable to go and see the next few speakers, one of whom was Ian R. Crane. When I later saw that a video of the speech he'd given had been uploaded on to YouTube, I immediately thought I'd watch it to see what I had missed.

Although I was aware of Ian R. Crane and had watched an early presentation of his on the subject of Codex Alimentarius, I really didn't know much else about him. The majority of the presentation largely dealt with issues surrounding the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico earlier that year. It was all fairly interesting stuff and I had no need to doubt the veracity of what he was saying. My only slight concern was when he mentioned his 'friend' Daniel Estulin and Estulin's claims that the Bilderbergs are 'trying to destroy China and Russia'. This is a highly dubious assertion for numerous reasons. It appeared to attribute way too much power to the 'Bilderbergs' and misrepresent their role in the agenda. Besides that, it seems to me that the ruling 'elite' of both China and Russia are very much a part of the broader agenda and any alleged conflict is just part of the game. I could have just dismissed this as a difference of opinion but he then spoke about how Estulin had been invited to speak to the EU parliament on the subject of the Bilderbergs. I think it's fairly safe to say that anyone who is invited to address the EU parliament would not be considered a threat to the established order.

Mass Immigration And The New Tower Of Babel

Pieter Bruegel's 16th century painting of the Tower of Babel

A New World Order

This article will attempt to shine a different light on the reasons behind mass immigration and multiculturalism. As relatively long as the article is it still can do little more than give an overview of what is a difficult and sensitive subject. One thing's for sure, as with most other things, the official reasoning as to why they have been enforced on a largely unwilling public is a long way from the actual truth.

 If we are to get a better understanding about why such things as mass immigration and multiculturalism are occurring we have to realise one fundamental thing. That is that there is a clear and identifiable agenda to create a one-world government and religious system sustained and supported by a global currency and financial system. This world government is an essential component of what its proponents often refer to as a New World Order. In it, the world is to be completely restructured and national boundaries and sovereignty are, at best, to become secondary if not obliterated all together. This new paradigm is often sugar coated as 'planetary citizenship' in the 'global village' but the reality will be anything but.

This New World Order has both a temporal and a spiritual dimension to it. The temporal or political aspect is best described as a form of 21st century feudalism where a self styled 'elite' few intend to extend their current control over the individual nations of the world into a global system of enslavement over all of humanity. This 'elite' consider themselves to be 'philosopher Kings' who know what's best for the rest us, who they consider to be human cattle in need of management and control. It's strongly suspected that the main vehicle for this temporal control is to be a reformed United Nations operating through regional governments such as the European Union. Those who are the very ones responsible for the innumerable problems in the world are now in the process of offering the solutions. Solutions that ultimately serve Their needs and interests rather than that of the rest of humanity.

A Short Break (And A Few Links)

I haven't posted for a while for several reasons but mainly because I'm going through a period of reflection at the moment. Continually exposing the New World Order seems pointless as there are countless sites doing that. Besides it's become clear to me that the 'exposure' of the New World Order is an element of the 'grand plan'. I'm sure I'll get the urge to begin posting again soon but until then I'll post a few links to some of the things I've been reading and watching over the last month or so.


I came across a series of videos by a young Scottish Christian that seeks to 'explore the New World Order from a Biblical perspective'. I've found it very enlightening and generally very good. I have two small gripes. They are that he seems to generalise and be overly sympathetic towards the Jews. What I mean by this is that he doesn't seem to acknowledge the role of Talmudic and Kabbalistic Jews in the New World Order. He's also more than a little fuzzy on issues surrounding banking and finance but to be fair he does mention that he's weak in this area.

New Age Communism: The "Zeitgeist" Agenda

In the last month or so I've had several 'discussions' with ardent members of the 'Zeitgeist Movement'. What struck was the fervour with which they defended the movement from my critical observations about it. I began to understand why some considered it to have become a cult.

 I'd seen the first two films and felt a little uneasy about them. The section in the first film 'exposing' Christianity was deeply flawed and the 'solution' proposed in Zeitgeist Addendum, namely the Venus Project, seemed more than a little suspect.

Reading an article on the Zeitgeist videos by Edward G. Griffin helped clarify my unease about the Venus Project and the excellent films Zeitgeist Debunked and Zeitgeist Refuted put the anti-Christian rhetoric in context. I did feel, however, that there was more to the Zeitgeist Movement than the above suggested. I'd come to understand that much of the so called 'Truth Movement' was a controlled 'psy-op' with one of its main aims, in simple terms, being to steer those who had woken up to the Orwellian New World Order being developed, in the direction of a 'good' world government. In addition this 'good' world government would have New Age (Theosophic) overtones. In short it would be the disguised New World Order the PTB were aiming for all along. As far back as 1959, William Guy Carr, in his manuscript 'Satan, Prince of This World', spoke of the Satanic elite's aim of getting us to destroy our own governments and then to usurp the first world government that would then be created.

I'd assembled some information and I was going to attempt a post on this but Richard Evans, writing on Henry Makow's website, has done a far better job than I could have hoped to have done. I've reproduced it in full below.

Just one observation. The author appears to place the 'Rothschild crime syndicate' at the centre of operations. Whilst they are indeed pivotal players in the 'game' I suspect the real controllers lie deeper in the shadows than the overt Rothschilds.

"The Zeitgeist solution is Communism re-packaged to rope in the 21st- century-truth seeker."

by Richard Evans (for henrymakow.com)

Shock and Awe - The Manipulation of the Human Psyche

Below are four videos by Alan Watt entitled 'Shock and Awe - The Manipulation of the Human Psyche'. I was alerted to them by Bovvered on the UK Column forum. He took the time to type a section of the transcript that he felt was relevant to the deeds and words of celebrity New World researchers such as David Icke. Having satisfied myself that Icke is controlled to some degree, consciously or not, it certainly seems to describe what could be happening with him and others. 


Counterintelligence – let’s talk about counterintelligence and how it works. What is intelligence? Intelligence gathering is sending agents out to simply listen; they listen in market places, bars, cafés, as to what the people are discussing. Lawrence of Arabia, in his own bookSeven Pillars of Wisdom [said he] was trained as an agent; he was trained in Aramaic, Arabic languages. He was given lots of money – he and eleven other people, trained from Cambridge – and sent over to the Arabic countries to start up Arabic newspapers. Once they started putting stories in the newspapers they went round the market places, they hired lots of guys to listen to gossip, to see if the intelligence they were putting out in the papers was being discussed by the recipients, the readers. That’s basic intelligence gathering. What is counterintelligence? Counterintelligence, from a government’s perspective, is taking information and data that could be crucial – it could be bad for the ruling regime – and finding ways to counter that knowledge; counter it.

Don't Watch TV

In case you hadn't guessed I've just got my hands on Photoshop CS5. Seeing as all I had was CS2 before this is something of a quantum leap for me. Hence the messing around with images and stuff.

The Scientific Dictatorships Of The Future

Aldous Huxley was the grandson of 'Darwin's bulldog' Thomas Huxley and the brother of Julian Huxley who, amongst other things, became the first director of UNESCO in 1948. He is perhaps best known for his book 'Brave New World', published in 1932, which was his vision of a future society. 


Huxley gave the speech linked to below in 1962. At this time his ideas about what the future would hold had developed. He discusses what he calls the 'scientific dictatorships of the future'. Whilst not appearing to be as enthusiastic for this as Bertrand Russell it should be remembered that he was very much a part of the elite. What he says can, though, be taken as a warning. Although it can't really be doubted that much of what he describes has already come to pass.


I tend to agree with Huxley in his assessment that scientific dictatorships would much prefer the techniques he discusses than the more direct methods outlined by George Orwell in 1984. Not for any moral reasons but for the purely practical reason outlined in the quote below. It should also be noted that, in his typical ambivalent style, Huxley also suggests the best way of defeating this nightmare.


"Only a large-scale popular movement toward decentralization and self-help can arrest the present tendency toward statism... A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers."

Is Nick Griffin A Freemason (Why The New World Order Needs The BNP)?

Asking if Nick Griffin is a Freemason may seem like an odd question to ask, but if the answer is yes then it seems almost certain that the BNP is what’s referred to as ‘controlled opposition’.

When I first started investigating the New World Order, or world government, agenda a few things became clear quite quickly. One of which was that throughout history the elite controllers of the enslavement system we live in have always planned very far ahead and attempted (and usually succeeded) in controlling both sides of any situation.

This is necessary in order to benefit from one of their favoured techniques known as the Hegelian dialectic. In short the theory is that a thesis results in a reaction, or anti-thesis and the resulting tension between the two is resolved by the synthesis. Those behind the drive for a NWO realised that if you  can control both the thesis and the anti-thesis then you are also able to control the outcome or synthesis. This being one of the key ways the agenda is advanced.

It is especially true of politics where it seems clear that all the major political parties are controlled to some degree. Our ‘democracy’ is little more than a charade or theatre for the masses. We have the Labour/ left/international Marxists (thesis) and the Conservative/right/globalist capitalists (anti-thesis) both played off against each other to give the illusion of democracy and to further the agenda. What it seems we actually have is a shadow government that is perpetually in power and that is controlled by, and operates in the interests of, a parasitical elite few and their acolytes. The politicians that we assume are in power are mostly either puppets or dupes.

Mind Control Theories and Techniques

The Vigilant Citizen has an written an excellent article on the subject mind control, some of the theories behind it and the techniques used to implement it, particularly by the mass media.


In recent months it has begun to dawn on me exactly how important this subject is. When speaking to people about, what can loosely be described as, the New World Order agenda it's been quite shocking to discover their reactions or points of view about certain things. They appear to have swallowed whole much of the propaganda and brainwashing that they've been fed. Of course I can't be too critical because it wasn't so very long ago that I too held views that had been 'shaped' by the purveyors of mind control in the form of our mass media and 'education' system. 


My first step was to realise that there is and has been for a very long time, a concerted effort to shape our perceptions (brainwash us). Once that's done we can begin to see how much of our ideas and points of view have been manipulated to a shocking degree.


It's a long essay so I won't post it in full here but I do recommend reading it if you have the time (or inclination). There are, however, a few choice quotes that I will post in order to tempt you to read it in full.

The Frankfurt School and the 'Radio Project'

The quotes below are taken from an excerpt, called 'The Frankfurt School and Political Correctness', which itself was taken from a larger work called 'The New Dark Age' by Michael Minnicino. They came to mind last week as I was watching and listening to the parade of (Freemason) Simon Cowell clones and major label 'superstars' (such as Jay Z, Lady Gaga, Robbie Williams and Lily Allen) at the Brits.

Of course 1939 was prior to the explosion of television but it's safe to assume that all they learnt on the 'Radio Project' was put to good use (and greater effect) in its development.

"Despite the official gloss, the activities of the Radio Project make it clear that its purpose was to test empirically the [Theodor] Adorno - [Walter] Benjamin thesis that the net effect of the mass media could be to atomize and increase lability--what people would later call "brainwashing."

"In 1939, one of the numbers of the quarterly Journal of Applied Psychology was handed over to Adorno and the Radio Project to publish some of their findings. Their conclusion was that Americans had, over the last twenty years, become "radio-minded," and that their listening had become so fragmented that repetition of format was the key to popularity. The play list determined the "hits"--a truth well known to organized crime, both then and now--and repetition could make any form of music or any performer, even a classical music performer, a "star." As long as a familiar form or context was retained, almost any content would become acceptable. "Not only are hit songs, stars, and soap operas cyclically recurrent and rigidly invariable types," said Adorno, summarizing this material a few years later, "but the specific content of the entertainment itself is derived from them and only appears to change. The details are interchangeable."

"The obvious point is this: the profoundly irrational forms of modern entertainment--the stupid and eroticized content of most TV and films, the fact that your local Classical music radio station programs Stravinsky next to Mozart--don't have to be that way. They were designed to be that way. The design was so successful, that today, no one even questions the reasons or the origins."

For an insight into the Frankfurt School and its history I'd recommend reading the rest.

Cultural Marxism is the Planned Destruction of Western Culture

I'm sure the author of this piece (about a quarter of the way down the page) felt much better after having written it. It has the feel of someone letting off an awful lot of steam. The subject of the article is Cultural Marxism and it's a wonderful summation of its pernicious effects. 

The article is posted in full below but there was one paragraph that got my attention. 


"Appeals to diversity, multi-racial harmony, and the mix of incompatible customs and beliefs in some multicultural stew are designed to produce weak liberal sissies who are incapable of discerning positive human values from slogans of control. They always follow the party line and look to parties and leaders to guide them. Kitsch is the poster culture of the lemmings who imagine they are part of some wave of history evolving consciously toward global utopia. They actually believe the promises and the image manipulation of the politicians. They are the conditioned robots who wait like baby birds with their beaks open, chirping for a worm from their socialist controllers and anxious about conformity to the next socialist directive. This is entirely consistent with the materialist view of history and the Pavlovian conditioning stimulus-response theory for the control of the socialist masses. These materialist liberals actually make themselves into conditioned serfs."


This could easily describe the majority of those in the 'media' and 'entertainment' industries, but as soon as I read the above, an image of Adrian Chiles came to mind. 

De-Hypnotism

The article below is by someone writing under the pseudonym Roage. It looms at the 'hypnotism' we are all under to some degree or other. Understanding how it works is the start of breaking free from its spell.

De-Hypnotism

The question is not who among us has been hypnotized, the question is who has not. The un-hypnotized man or woman finds him or her self in a sea of people who cannot see past their blindness. This is the reason why the truth teller cannot break through to the “skeptic”. For this reason one must first place him or her self in a position to see and only when they do so can they ever hope to glimpse the truth. Under most circumstances the chances that a man or woman wakes up are very slim indeed and there are good reasons for this. Modern hypnotists are not turbaned magicians in dark robes holding a pocket watch. They wear business suits and swim suits and their disguises are virtually impenetrable by the target of their efforts. They are very effective and have charmed all but a fraction of a percent of all people in the world. Many wake up but again fall under the spell over and over. They get a glimpse but do not know what has happened. Slowly they succumb to the droning of the hypnotist´s tools of the trade.

If one does not understand the nature of hypnotism and its awesome power to shape every aspect of our lives and perception then they cannot hope to break through to freedom. Why is modern hypnotism so effective in our “modern civilized age”?

Trust is the key to hypnotism as one cannot be hypnotized if they do not trust the hypnotist. One might assume that one must trust a man or woman, to be hypnotized by, them but they seldom understand that ideas and concepts in which we place our trust are equally mesmerizing and are as effective as any human hypnotist. One who is skeptic of people may believe him or her self immune but they can easily be hypnotized voluntarily by introducing false information that clouds their perception such that they alter their perception around, most notably, a false view of reality. This conditioning starts very early with our parents demanding that we accept their authority and expect us to trust blindly what they say without verification. The worst thing a parent can do to their child when the child asks “why?” is to tell them “because I said so”. It is better so say “I do not know” or even better “figure it out for yourself”. This automatic conditioning creates an individual that moves from one trust relationship to another or from one hypnotist to another and creates an un-ending chain that takes diligence and persistence to break. The teacher hands you a book and because we trust our teacher, sometimes without condition, they introduce us to a carefully crafted false reality that leaves us a slave in fear of pain, suffering and death such that we are convinced that the powerful determine our lives for us.

The Matrix is Real

I came across the article below on the International Mens Organisation website but it was first posted on the TPUC forum . It's so good I just had to post it here for posterity.

I have only one quibble though. The assertion that Islam is being manipulated into conflict with the 'Christian' west is quite correct. I would add that this is only possible because Islam allows this to happen. It would take too long to list the many shortcomings of both Islam and it's prophet Mohammed. Yes there are 'good' parts to Islam but that's far from the whole story. If we are to find ways to prevent this manipulated clash from manifesting itself we have to be honest and truthful about the situation.

Anyway, that aside, this is a wonderful piece of writing that I hope you take the time to read.

THE MATRIX IS REAL by George Monsoon.

I have chosen to take the Red Pill – are you ready to find out how deep the rabbit hole goes?

I am not crazy. At least I don't feel crazy. I have no internal voices "telling me what to do". I am not an extremist, or a conspiracy theorist. I do not look to the skies for signs of intelligent life, although many would argue that looking for intelligent life on earth is probably not the best place to start!

I didn't ask to be born into this "society". I gave nobody permission to apply a fictional "person" to my human self, and then manipulate the facts to shroud my judgment under a convenient truth, through false information and forced ignorance. I was just 19 when I started to ask questions. At that time I was confused, without any clear direction. I did at that time wonder if there was something very wrong with me, because I was asking questions, and not conforming to what I later found out to be called “stereotypes”.

So I started to read books, ask people questions, and a lot of things just did not add up and I got extremely angry with the world.

For the first time in my life I rebelled. There was something terribly wrong with the world and I needed to find out what it was and what was causing it? At that time I could not quantify the facts, so I remained angry and upset for many years. I renounced my indoctrinated Catholic faith, and stopped going to church and felt very alone. It took 2 decades, 1 failed marriage and near nervous breakdown before I finally managed to build a clear picture of what is really going on.

The Scientific Manipulation Of Our Reality

The No World System website has an excellent article entitled 'The Scientific Manipulation of Our Reality'. It is based around several quotes from Bertrand Russell, the Fabian Socialist , eugenicist and World Government enthusiast.

In order to tempt you to read the article I've placed just a few of Russell's quotes below. They lay bare the thinking that's prevalent amongst the elites of this country who are only too happy to enslave us. Can anyone doubt that Russell's words have guided and influenced the controllers of our society right up to the present day?

“Science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated” in other-words the public will not be allowed to know how it’s beliefs and opinions were scientifically manipulated by the government to think a certain way. “Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play.”


"...the best system in existence produced Karl Marx. In future such failures are not likely to occur where there is dictatorship. Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.”


“This consideration brings us naturally to the subject of education, which is the second great method of public propaganda. Education has two very different purposes; on the one hand it aims at developing the individual and giving him knowledge which will be useful to him; on the other hand it aims at producing citizens who will be convenient for the State or the Church which is educating them. Up to a point these two purposes coincide in practice: it is convenient to the State that citizens should be able to read, and that they should possess some technical skill in virtue of which they are able to do productive work; it is convenient that they should possess sufficient moral character to abstain from unsuccessful crime, and sufficient intelligence to be able to direct their own lives. But when we pass beyond these elementary requirements, the interests of the individual may often conflict with those of the State or the Church. This is especially the case in regard to credulity. To those who control publicity, credulity is an advantage, while to the individual a power of critical judgment is likely to be beneficial; consequently the State does not aim at producing a scientific habit of mind, except in a small minority of experts, who are well paid, and therefore, as a rule, supporters of the status quo. Among those who are not well paid credulity is more advantageous to the State; consequently children in school are taught what they are told and are punished if they express disbelief. In this way a conditioned reflex is established, leading to a belief in anything said authoritatively by elderly persons of importance.” “On the whole, at present in education, the form of loyalty to the State which is most emphasized is hostility to its enemies.”

Please read the rest.

Drowning in a Sea of Irrelevance

Fellist, on his blog 'Songlight for Dawn', has posted several pages of Peter Hitchens' book 'The Abolition of Britain'. I have a great deal of sympathy with the ideas behind the book as the more I've researched the more I've realised that there is a clear objective of subverting and destroying Britain.

The subject of the post is, essentially, the role that television has played and continues to play, in the subversion and destruction process, both collectively and individually. I certainly recommend reading the whole thing but there was one short paragraph that stood out for me. It managed to express a conclusion that I had been slowly coming to.

"[American commentator Neil] Postman returned to the assault in Amusing Ourselves to Death, where he warned that we should not be complacent just because we had avoided George Orwell's nightmare totalitarian society, which he had predicted for 1984. What was actually coming true, he suggested, was Aldous Huxley's alternative nightmare in Brave New World, where nobody even realized that they were being oppressed.

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared that we would become a trivial culture.

Huxley, in fact, warned directly of 'man's almost infinite capacity for distractions.' Postman believes that capacity has been fully engaged in the last twenty years."

I'm not sure we have avoided Orwell's nightmare just yet. It seems to me it is being slowly constructed all around us. What is true, however, is that the overwhelming majority of people don't realise they are being slowly repressed. Mixed in with that number are some who have an idea that 'something's not quite right' but who shrug their shoulders and go back to the distractions of their choice.

Then there are the very few who both know what is going on and who are eager to do something about it. Hitchens himself would fall into this category but how many would easily dismiss anything he says as the (mind control trigger) words of a 'right winger' or 'conservative'. I know I used to.

The scariest of all is the idea that there is no need to ban books as there are very few who want to read them. I've tried countless times to interest friends and acquaintances of mine in the New World Order, World Government agenda (of which Hitchens' observations is a small part of) with little or no success. Nothing, it seems, can penetrate the need for the myriad distractions that surround them. They are, indeed, drowning in a sea of irrelevance.

I'm only grateful that I'm slowly managing to break free from it all.

Television and the Hive Mind

I read the article below, by Mack White, on the Truth Seeker website. If there's anyone in any doubt as to the psychological effects and consequences of watching TV then this article should help to dispel them. We are, quite literally, being programed.

Television and the Hive Mind

Sixty-four years ago this month, six million Americans became unwitting subjects in an experiment in psychological warfare.

It was the night before Halloween, 1938. At 8 p.m. CST, the Mercury Radio on the Air began broadcasting Orson Welles' radio adaptation of H. G. Wells' War of the Worlds. As is now well known, the story was presented as if it were breaking news, with bulletins so realistic that an estimated one million people believed the world was actually under attack by Martians. Of that number, thousands succumbed to outright panic, not waiting to hear Welles' explanation at the end of the program that it had all been a Halloween prank, but fleeing into the night to escape the alien invaders.

Meme Supreme: Predictive Programming In Action

Blogger Neil Kramer gives us a small example of predictive programming. This is much more widespread than may be appreciated. Not only in the newspaper headlines he's referring to but also in TV and Hollywood films.

"Predictive programming presents and acclimatizes the public to new ideas, trends and beliefs. Fundamentally, it forms compelling mental associations between emotionally charged concepts and word patterns. The programming attempts to fuse emotive and abstract elements together, such as: 'economic stability' and 'new world order', 'global co-operation' and 'new world order', and underpinning everything - 'security' and 'new world order'.


When a specific word pattern is then later invoked - new world order - the emotional charge (energetic frequency) is activated in the individual, and therefore the collective mind. The reality blueprint is being broadcast, across billions of pages and screens, enlisting the consciousness of those who choose not to create their own reality.


Observe how this viral meme seeding will escalate over the coming months.


Fortunately, unplugging from their cynical and insidious surface programming is uncomplicated. Turn it off. Organically program yourself... with your own feelings, discernment, humanity and knowledge. Conscious recognition of your own sovereign being neutralizes the charge of their pale proclamations."

Brainwashing: How the British Use the Media for Mass Psychological Warfare

Absolutely nobody living in Britain today should be under any illusion as to the level of, intentional, brainwashing they've been subjected to since they were born. It's only when you look into the subject to some degree that you begin to see how this brainwashing is done and the results it has produced.

This essay, first printed in the American Almanac in 1997,  serves as a good introduction to the subject of 'mass psychological warfare' or 'shaping public perceptions'. Below are a few quotes.

The media, he proclaimed, is the most powerful weapon and ``agent of change'' in the fight to establish a "one-worldist,'' neo-Malthusian order that will transcend and obliterate the concept of the nation-state.

It shouldn't be a surprise that the end result of all this psychological control is, of course the New World Order's world government.

It can also call on the capabilities of a mass psychological warfare machine, also run by the British and their assets, which extends into key phases of media production, and includes writers and psychiatrists who help shape the content, and the pollsters who fine-tune and analyze the impact on targetted populations. Beyond this interacting network, there are millions of participants involved in the production, distribution, and transmission of media messages, whose thinking, in turn, has been shaped by the content of the media product, and who are, effectively, self-brainwashed by the culture within which they live.

Everywhere from Hollywood to the BBC (especially the BBC) is involved. The concept of those working in these industries being 'self-brainwashed' is an important one.

In the 1930s, Tavistock's extended networks developed a symbiotic relationship with the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research, created by European oligarchical networks, which focussed on the study and criticism of culture from a neo-Freudian standpoint.

The cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School and the Tavistock Institute were created by "European oligarchical networks' for the same end.

Subversion, demoralisation and control of Western nations with a view of subsuming them into a Communist/Fascist world government.

As Tavistock's researches showed, it was important that the victims of mass brainwashing not be aware that their environment was being controlled; there should thus be a vast number of sources for information, whose messages could be varied slightly, so as to mask the sense of external control.

"Were people to think about this process too much, it might break down .. but", he writes, "the mass of absolutely illiterate, of feeble minded, grossly neurotic, undernourished and frustrated individuals is very considerable, much more considerable, there is reason to think, than we generally suppose. Thus a wide popular appeal is circulated among persons who are mentally children or barbarians, whose lives are a morass of entanglements, people whose vitality is exhausted, shut-in people, and people whose experience has comprehended no factor in the problem under discussion."

The process has broken down for certain people but you can see now why there's been a relentless drive to 'dumb down' the population in as many imaginative ways as possible. The end results perfectly described in the above paragraph.

Please read the rest.

Ex-Illuminati Programmer Explains Techniques

The subject of 'mind control' (brainwashing, programming, conditioning etc) falls into two main categories. There are attempts at mass psychological persuasion through such avenues as the media and education but there is also the targeting of individuals. Very often this starts when the subject is an infant or even, as we see below, still in the womb.


The extent of the use of mind control and its importance to those involved in the agenda shouldn't be underestimated. Victims can be used for anything from assassinations to roles in the entertainment industry. The latter being well documented at the excellent Pseudo Occult Media blog.


Here are some of the techniques used (h/t Illuminati Mind Control blog).

The programming techniques that I (Svali) will describe take an incredible amount of effort, time, dedication, and planning on the part of the cult to place in the individual. Only a very motivated group of people would spend the time it takes to do this. These chapters are very hard for me to write, as an individual, since my role in the cult was that of a programmer. So, the very techniques you will be reading about were often those that I used to place programming in individuals that I worked with. I no longer do these things, nor do I espouse doing them; the reason I am writing this book is that I believe that therapists who work with DID, as well as survivors, deserve to know WHAT is done to people, HOW it is done, as well as be given some ideas on how to undo the programming that the cult places in people.

First, I would like to address unintentional programming versus intentional programming. This is also known as the environmental milieu the child is raised in. The programming of a generational Illuminati infant often begins before its birth (this will be addressed later) but once it is born, the very environment the infant is raised in becomes a form of programming. Often, the infant is raised in a family environment that combines daytime abandonment with dysfunction in the parental figures. The infant soon learns that the nighttime, and cult activities, are the truly important ones. The infant may be deprived of attention, or even abused, in the daytime; and is only treated as special, or "seen" by the parent, in the cult setting. This can lead to very young alters around the core or core splits, who feel "invisible", abandoned, rejected, unworthy of love or attention, or that they don't even exist, unless they are doing a job for their "family".
Another milieu and conditioning process the infant must face is that the adults around him/her are INCONSISTENT, since the adults in a generational cult family are almost always also multiple, or DID. This sets up a reality for the infant/toddler that the parents act one way at home; an entirely different way at cult gatherings; and yet a different way in normal society.

Since these are the infant's earliest experiences of adults and adult behaviors, it has no choice but to accept this reality that human beings act in shockingly different ways in different settings. While unintentional, this sets the infant up for later dissociation, in mimicry of the adults around it.

INTENTIONAL PROGRAMMING

Intentional programming of an infant in the Illuminati often begins before birth. Prenatal splitting is well known in the cult, as the fetus is very capable of fragmenting in the womb due to trauma. This is usually done between the seventh and ninth month of pregnancy. Techniques used include: placing headphones on the mother's abdomen, and playing loud, discordant music (such as some modern classical pieces, or even Wagner's operas). Loud, heavy rock has also been used. Other methods include having the mother ingest quantities of bitter substances, to make the amniotic fluid bitter, or yelling at the fetus inside the womb. The mother's abdomen may be hit as well. Mild shock to the abdomen may be applied, especially when term is near, and may be used to cause premature labor, or ensure that the infant is born on a ceremonial holiday. Certain labor inducing drugs may be also given if a certain birth date is desired.
Once the infant is born, testing is begun at a very early age, usually during the first few weeks of life. The trainers, who are taught to look for certain qualities in the infant, will place it on a velvet cloth on a table, and check its reflexes to different stimuli. The infant's strength, how it reacts to heat, cold, and pain are all tested. Different infants react differently, and the trainers are looking for dissociative ability, quick reflexes, and reaction times. They are also encouraging early dissociation in the infant with these tests.

The infant will also be abused, to create fragments. Methods of abuse can include: rectal probes; digital anal rape; electric shocks at low levels to the fingers, toes, and genitalia; cutting the genitalia in ritual circumstances (in older infants). The intent is to begin fragmentation before a true ego state develops, and customize the infant to pain and reflexive dissociation from pain (yes, even tiny infants dissociate; I have seen it time and time again; they will glow blank and limp, or glassy, in the face of continued trauma.)

Isolation and abandonment programming will sometimes be begun as well, in a rudimentary sense. The infant is abandoned, or uncared for by adults, intentionally during the daytime, then picked up, soothed, cleaned up and paid attention to in the context of preparing for a ritual or group gathering. This is done in order to help the infant associate night gatherings with "love" and attention, and to help the bonding process to the cult, or "family". The infant will be taught to associate maternal attention with going to rituals, and eventually will associate cult gatherings with feelings of security.

As the infant grows older, i.e. at 15 to 18 months, more fragmenting is intentionally done by having the parents as well as cult members abuse the infant more methodically. This is done by intermittently soothing, bonding with the infant, then shocking it on its digits; the infant may be dropped from heights to a mat or mattress and laughed at as it lays there startled and terrified, crying. It may be placed in cages for periods of time, or exposed to short periods of isolation. Deprivation of food, water, and basic needs may begin later in this stage. All of these methods are done in order to create intentional dissociation in the infant. The infant of this age may be taken to group meetings, but outside of special occasions, or dedications, will have no active role yet in the cult setting. The small infants are usually left with a cult member, or caretaker, who watches them during the group's activities; this caretaker role is usually rotated among lower level or teenage members.

Between the ages of 20 and 24 months, the toddler may begin the "steps of discipline" which the Illuminati use to teach their children. The age the child begins them will vary, depending upon the group, the parent, the trainer, and the child. These "steps of discipline" would be better called "steps of torment and abuse" as their purpose is to create a highly dissociative child, out of touch with their feelings, who is completely and unthinkingly loyal to the cult. The order of the steps may also be varied a little, depending on the whims of the trainer or parents.

I will first discuss the first five steps of discipline: (note: these steps may vary somewhat from region to region, but most follow this outline at least roughly, even if not in the same order)

First step: to not need

The small toddler/child is placed in a room without any sensory stimulus, usually a training room with gray, white, or beige walls. The adult leaves and the child is left alone, for periods of time: these may vary from hours, to an entire day as the child grows older. If the child begs the adult to stay, and not leave, or screams, the child is beaten, and told that the periods of isolation will increase until they learn to stop being weak. The ostensible purpose of this discipline is to teach the child to rely on its own internal resources, and not on outside people ("strengthen it"). What it actually does is create a huge terror of abandonment within the child. When the adult, or trainer, returns to the room, the child is often found rocking itself, or hugging itself in a corner, occasionally almost catatonic from fear. The trainer will then "rescue" the child, feed and give it something to drink and bond with the child as their "savior". The trainer will tell them the "family" told the trainer to rescue the child, because its family "loves" it. The trainer will instill cult teachings, at this point, into the helpless, fearful, and almost insanely grateful child who has just been "rescued" from isolation. The trainer will reinforce in the child over and over how much it "needs " its family, who just rescued it from death by starvation or abandonment. This will teach the very young toddler to associate comfort and security with bonding with its trainer, who may be one of its parents, and being with "family" members. The cult is very aware of child developmental principles, and has developed exercises like the above after hundreds of years of teaching very young children.

Second step: to not want

This step is very similar to the first step, and actually reinforces it. It will be done intermittently with the first step over the next few years of the child's life. Again, the child is left alone in a training room, or isolated room, without food or water for a long period of time. An adult will enter the room, with a large pitcher of ice water, or food. If the child asks for either, as the adult is eating or drinking in front of the child, he/she is severely punished for being weak and needy. This step is reinforced, until the child learns not to ask for food or water unless it is offered first. The ostensible reason the cult gives for this step is that it creates a child who is strong, and can go without food and water for longer and longer periods of time. The real reason this is done is that it creates a child who is completely dissociated from its own needs for food, water, or other comforts, who becomes afraid to ask outside adults for help. This creates in the child a hyper-vigilance as she/he learns to look for outside adults for cues on when it is okay to fulfill needs, and not to trust her/his own body signals. The child is already learning to look outside itself to others to learn how it should think or feel, instead of trusting its own feelings. The cult now becomes the locus of control for the child.

Third step: to not wish

The child is placed in a room with favorite toys, or objects. A kind adult comes into the room and engages the child in play. This adult my be a friend, aunt, parent, or trainer. The child and adult may engage in fantasy play about the child's secret wishes, dreams, or wants. This will occur on several occasions, and the child's trust is slowly gained. At some later point, the child is severely punished for any aspect of wishing or fantasy shared with the adult, including the destruction of favorite toys, going in and undoing or destroying secret safe places the child may have created, or even destroying non cult protectors. This step is repeated, with variations, many times over the ensuing years. Occasionally, the child's siblings, parents, or friends will be used to reveal inside fantasies the child has revealed to them during the daytime, or in unguarded moments. The ostensible reason the cult gives for this step is to create a child who doesn't fantasize, who is more outwardly directed, less inwardly directed. In other words, the child is to look to adults for permission in all aspects of its life, including internal. The reality is that this step destroys all safe places the child has created internally, to retreat from the horrors it is experiencing. This step creates in the child the feeling that there is no true safety, that the cult will find out everything it thinks. Exercises like this are also used to create young alters in the child who will self report to the cult trainers any secret safe places, or covert wishes against the cult, that other alters have. This will then begin to set up intersystem hostility and divisiveness, which the cult will manipulate throughout the
person's life span in order to control them.

Fourth step: the survival of the fittest

This step is used in order to begin creating perpetrator alters in the young child. ALL CULT MEMBERS WILL BE EXPECTED TO BECOME PERPETRATORS; THIS BEGINS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD. The child is brought into a room where there is a trainer and another child of approximately the same age, or slightly younger, that the child being taught. The child is severely beaten, for a long period of time, by the trainer, then told to hit the other child in the room, or they will be beaten further. If the child refuses, it is punished severely, the other child is punished as well, then the child is told to punish the other child. If the child continues to refuse, or cries, or tries to hit the trainer instead, they will continue to be beaten severely, and told to hit the other child, to direct its anger at the other child. This step is repeated until the child finally complies. This step is begun around age 2 to 2 1/2, and is used to create aggressive perpetrator alters in the young child. As the child becomes older, the punishing tasks become more and more brutal. Children are expected to become perpetrators of others at very young ages, and will "practice" on children younger than themselves, with the encouragement and rewarding by the adults around them. They will also be mimicking these adults, who role model perpetration constantly as normal. The child will be taught that this is the acceptable outlet for the aggressive impulses and rage that are created by the brutality the child is constantly being exposed to.

Fifth step: the code of silence

Many, many different stratagems are used to put this in, starting at around the age of two years old, when a child starts becoming more verbal. Usually, after a ritual or group gathering, the child is asked about what they saw, or heard, during the meeting. Like most obedient young children, they will comply. They are immediately severely beaten, or tortured, and a new alter is created, who is told to keep or guard the memories of what was seen, on pain of their life. The new part always agrees. The child and this new part are put through a ceremony of swearing to never ever tell; and alters are created whose job it is to kill the body, if the other parts ever remember.

The child is also put through severe psychological torture to ensure that it will never be tempted to tell, including: being buried alive; near drowning; watching "traitor's deaths" involving slow painful torture, such as being burned, or skinned alive; being buried with a partially rotted corpse and being told that they will become a corpse like it if they ever tell, etc. The scenarios go on and on, invented by people with endlessly cruel imaginations, in order to ensure the secrecy of the young child. These methods have been perfected over hundreds of years of practice by the cult with its children. The reason these things are done is self evident: the cult is involved in criminal activities, as explained in the first few chapters of this book, and they want to ensure the continued silence of its children. This is one reason why the cult has survived so long, and with its continued shroud of secrecy; why more survivors are afraid/unwilling to disclose their abuse. In order to reveal cult secrets, a child must go against some of the most tremendously horrendous psychological trauma and abuse imaginable; even as an adult, the survivor has difficulty putting these things aside, when discussing their abuse. Children and adults alike are told that if they ever tell, they will be hunted down and shot (the assassin training lets the child know that this is no idle threat); that they will be tortured slowly. The child will be exposed to setups and role plays throughout their growing up that reinforces this step.

SUGGESTIONS THAT MAY HELP

I believe in also offering some ideas on how to undo some of the above mentioned programming, as I do not believe in knowledge, only for knowledge's sake. The survivor often needs tools, in order to try and undo some of the horrendous abuse that the cult places him/her through, especially as memories of these things occur. THESE ARE JUST MEANT AS HELPFUL HINTS AND DO NOT REPLACE THE ADVICE OF A GOOD THERAPIST.

1. Early milieu programming:

This is difficult to undo, since it hits on core abandonment issues, and rejection, for the survivor. This will often have been the survivor's very first, earliest experiences as an infant, involving its relationship with its parents and primary family members. Working on this requires the whole hearted effort of all alter systems inside, to join in nurturing the core splits who experienced severe parental rejection, and the cognitive recognition that the DAYTIME was important, too; that the adults around the infant were the unhealthy ones. The infant's often feel unlovable, overly needy, depressed; but nurturing alters inside can help comfort them, and share the reality that the infant really was loveable, no matter what the outside adults around it were like. Here, too, an outside supportive therapist, and a strong, nurturing faith system, can help tremendously in the healing process, as new messages are brought in to the abandoned, wounded parts. Sorting through what happened, grieving over the real issues of abandonment, and bringing reality to very young, deeply wounded parts will take time.

2. Early intentional fragmentation: (ages 0 to 24 months)

Usually there are cognitive parts of the survivor inside, who have never ever forgotten the abuse, and can help share the cognitive reality of the abuse with the amnesic alters. This should be done extremely slowly, since this first abuse was done quite early in life. Creating an internal nursery, with safe toys, objects, can help. Older nurturing adult alters inside can help hold and care for the wounded infants inside the nursery, while acknowledging and grieving over the abuse which occurred. It is important to believe an validate the young parts when they come forward to share. Allowing them nonverbal ways of expressing themselves can help, as these are quite young parts, who often cannot talk yet. Having older children inside who are close to the infants verbalize their wants, needs, and fears can also help, as often the youngest parts inside do not trust ANY adults, even internal ones. A strong ,caring outside therapist is also important to healing, by modeling healthy nurturing to a system that may have no concept of this, while balancing the need of the infant for outside nurture with the need for the internal system(s) to learn their own self nurture techniques. Internal helpers can reach the infants, ground them, share present reality (that the body is older, the infants are safe, etc. These helpers may be internal older children, as mentioned before). The survivor may also want to find support adults when possible, who can help with modeling healthy caring with good boundaries.

A THERAPIST OR FRIEND CANNOT RE-PARENT THE SURVIVOR. The survivor will long for this, but realistically, the survivor has one set of parents, good or bad, or sadly, even terrible. No outside person can come in and redo the complete re-parenting of another. What the therapist and support person can offer will be caring, empathy, listening, while the survivor grieves over the loss of adequate nurture. They can offer friendship or empathy with good boundaries. They cannot become the survivor's parents, or therapy will not progress. Instead, enmeshment will begin.

3.The First Five Steps of Discipline (there are twelve total; others will be addressed in later chapters)

Try to find the parts that experienced the abuse. This may mean doing system mapping (drawing pictures of what things look like inside), and going to the cognitives (intellectuals) or controllers (head honchos inside) for information. An internal helper, or recorder, may also be extremely helpful in doing this.
Allow these parts to slowly acknowledge the agony that they experienced during their deprivation: heat (being held over a fire, or stove); cold (such as being placed in freezers, or ice, for example), lack of food, etc. Encourage the sharing of the cognitive portion of the memories first, while allowing amnesic alters to grieve over "hearing about" these things. Allow them time to absorb hearing about these traumas, as they occurred over several years during early childhood, and will take time to assimilate. Healing can't be rushed. Allow feeling alters later to step forward, and share their feelings, while more cognitive or helper parts are inside holding their hands, grounding them to the here and now throughout the process of remembering Be prepared for floods of emotion at times, as well as body memories, as the abuse is recalled. A group of inside people can be designated as a "grounding team" to help ground these parts as they step forward and share their memories.

Remembering safely assumes that the person has a qualified therapist, and also has laid the groundwork for good intrasystem cooperation, as discussed above. Memory work should not be done until there is good communication and cooperation inside, or the person will be overwhelmed by the memories as they come out. They will be flooded and re-traumatized instead of helped, and may de-compensate. With good communication, memories can be brought out a little at a time, in manageable pieces, while cognitive alters continually help keep the survivor from going completely into the memory, and they can also help ground the more wounded parts.

The cult will put people through certain types of programming in order to achieve a specific goal: separating the intellect, or cognition, form the feelings in a person. Cognitive alters in these systems are always considered "higher" than the feeling alters; cognitive alters are taught to "pass down" their feelings to the "lower" feeling alters. While these labels are untrue, the cognitive alters will fear feeling the intense, overwhelming emotions that caused them to split further and further from the more limbic, or feeling alters internally. This will drive continued system divisiveness in the survivor. It is important that cognitive parts realize that the feeling alters are part of them; that they can practice sharing their feelings in SMALL steps without needing to be flooded, or overwhelmed.

A reminder: EXTERNAL SAFETY IS PARAMOUNT TO UNDOING INSIDE PROGRAMMING. You HAVE to be able to promise these parts external safety, and deliver on this promise, or they will understandably balk at working inside on undoing programming. Why should they try and change, only to go back and be punished again? No system will undo its own protective dissociation, if the abuse is ongoing, or it will continue to destabilize and re-dissociate over and over. This is because dismantling the dissociation would mean dismantling its own survival and protection. Stopping contact with perpetrators and having a safe therapist are the very first steps to take, before attempting to undo internal programming. A system can still work on stopping cult contact, and begin healing , while being accessed, but it will slow therapy down tremendously as the internal energy will be diverted to staying safe rather than undoing trauma. A person can heal, and most survivors are still in cult contact when they enter therapy. BUT the progress will go much more quickly once cult contact is broken. (see chapter on preventing accessing of the survivor).